Make-or-Buy Policy Decision in Maintenance Planning for Mobility: A Multi-Criteria Approach
-
Published:2024-05-20
Issue:2
Volume:8
Page:55
-
ISSN:2305-6290
-
Container-title:Logistics
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Logistics
Author:
Ortalli Tommaso1, Di Martino Andrea1ORCID, Longo Michela1ORCID, Zaninelli Dario1ORCID
Affiliation:
1. Department of Energy, Politecnico di Milano, 20156 Milan, Italy
Abstract
Background: The ongoing technical innovation is fully involving transportation sector, converting the usual mass-transit system toward a sustainable mobility. Make-or-buy decision are usually adopted to assess different solutions in terms of costs-benefits to put in place strategic choices regarding in-house production or from an external supplier. This can also be reflected on maintenance operations, thus replicating a similar approach to transport companies involved. Method: A decision-making model by means of a multi-criteria analysis can lead make-or-buy choices adapted to maintenance. A brief introduction into the actual mobility context is provided, evaluating global and national trends with respect to the mobility solutions offered. Then, a focus is set on maintenance approaches in mobility sector and the need of a make-or-buy decision process is considered. The decision-making path is developed through a multi-criteria framework based on eigenvector weighing assessment, where different Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) are identified and exploited to assess the maintenance approach at stake. Results: A comparison among different scenarios considered helped in identify the solution offered to the transport operator. In particular, for the case study of interest a −35% decrease in maintenance specific cost and −44% in cost variability were found. Reliability of the fleet was kept at an acceptable level compared to the reference in-house maintenance (≥90%) while an increase in the Mean Time Between Failure was observed. Conclusions: For the purposes of a small company, the method can address the choice of outsourcing maintenance as the best. Finally, a general trend is then extrapolated from the analysis performed, in order to constitute a decision guideline. The research can benefit from further analysis to test and validate that the selected approach is effective from the perspective of transport operator.
Reference43 articles.
1. Van Audenhove, F.J., Pourbaix, J., Rominger, G., Eagar, R., Dommergues, E., and Carlie, J. (2020). The Future of Mobility Post-COVID, UITP (Union Internationale des Transports Publics), Arthur D. Little Future Lab. Resreport. 2. Capata, R. (2018). Urban and Extra-Urban Hybrid Vehicles: A Technological Review. Energies, 11. 3. Baccelli, O., Brenna, C., Grea, G., Sileo, A., Papa, C., Armiento, M., and Cordella, I. (2021). Scenari e Prospettive Dell’Elettrificazione del Trasporto Pubblico su Strada, Università Bocconi, Enel Foundation. Resreport. 4. Rosyidi, C.N., Pratama, M.A., Jauhari, W.A., Suhardi, B., and Hamada, K. (2016, January 4–7). Make or buy analysis model in a multi-stage manufacturing processes. Proceedings of the 2016 IEEE International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management (IEEM), Bali, Indonesia. 5. Agostino, M., Caballini, C., Chiara, B.D., and La Scala, P. (2020, January 20–23). Compliance of maintenance and operational needs for trains: A simulation analysis to evaluate the impact of a flexible scheduling on local transport by rail. Proceedings of the 2020 IEEE 23rd International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC), Rhodes, Greece.
|
|