LSTM-Autoencoder Deep Learning Model for Anomaly Detection in Electric Motor
Author:
Lachekhab Fadhila1ORCID, Benzaoui Messouada2, Tadjer Sid Ahmed3ORCID, Bensmaine Abdelkrim1, Hamma Hichem1
Affiliation:
1. Applied Automation Laboratory, Faculty of Hydrocarbon & Chemistry, University M’Hamed Bougara, Boumerdes 35000, Algeria 2. Applied Automation Laboratory, Institute of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, University M’Hamed Bougara, Boumerdes 35000, Algeria 3. Electrification of Industrial Enterprises Laboratory, Faculty of Hydrocarbon & Chemistry, University M’Hamed Bougara, Boumerdes 35000, Algeria
Abstract
Anomaly detection is the process of detecting unusual or unforeseen patterns or events in data. Many factors, such as malfunctioning hardware, malevolent activities, or modifications to the data’s underlying distribution, might cause anomalies. One of the key factors in anomaly detection is balancing the trade-off between sensitivity and specificity. Balancing these trade-offs requires careful tuning of the anomaly detection algorithm and consideration of the specific domain and application. Deep learning techniques’ applications, such as LSTMs (long short-term memory algorithms), which are autoencoders for detecting an anomaly, have garnered increasing attention in recent years. The main goal of this work was to develop an anomaly detection solution for an electrical machine using an LSTM-autoencoder deep learning model. The work focused on detecting anomalies in an electrical motor’s variation vibrations in three axes: axial (X), radial (Y), and tangential (Z), which are indicative of potential faults or failures. The presented model is a combination of the two architectures; LSTM layers were added to the autoencoder in order to leverage the LSTM capacity for handling large amounts of temporal data. To prove the LSTM efficiency, we will create a regular autoencoder model using the Python programming language and the TensorFlow machine learning framework, and compare its performance with our main LSTM-based autoencoder model. The two models will be trained on the same database, and evaluated on three primary points: training time, loss function, and MSE anomalies. Based on the obtained results, it is clear that the LSTM-autoencoder shows significantly smaller loss values and MSE anomalies compared to the regular autoencoder. On the other hand, the regular autoencoder performs better than the LSTM, comparing the training time. It appears then, that the LSTM-autoencoder presents a superior performance although it was slower than the standard autoencoder due to the complexity of the added LSTM layers.
Funder
Directorate General for Scientific Research and Technological Development DGRSDT, Ministry of Higher Education and Scientific Research, Algeria
Reference37 articles.
1. Coandă, P., Avram, M., and Constantin, V. (2020, January 4–5). A state of the art of predictive maintenance techniques. Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Advanced Concepts in Mechanical Engineerin, Iași, Romania. 2. Wentz, V.H., Maciel, J.N., Gimenez Ledesma, J.J., and Ando Junior, O.H. (2022). Solar Irradiance Forecasting to Short-Term PV Power: Accuracy Comparison of ANN and LSTM Models. Energies, 15. 3. A survey on deep learning and its applications;Dong;Comput. Sci. Rev.,2021 4. Böhm, L., Kolb, S., Plankenbühler, T., Miederer, J., Markthaler, S., and Karl, J. (2023). Short-Term Natural Gas and Carbon Price Forecasting Using Artificial Neural Networks. Energies, 16. 5. Son, N., Yang, S., and Na, J. (2019). Hybrid Forecasting Model for Short-Term Wind Power Prediction Using Modified Long Short-Term Memory. Energies, 12.
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|