Psychometric Properties of Suboptimal Health Status Instruments: A Systematic Review

Author:

Alzain Mohamed Ali12ORCID,Asweto Collins Otieno3ORCID,Hassan Sehar-un-Nisa1ORCID,Saeed Mohammed Elshiekh45,Kassar Ahmed1ORCID,Alsaif Bandar1

Affiliation:

1. Department of Public Health, College of Public Health and Health Informatics, University of Ha’il, Ha’il 55476, Saudi Arabia

2. Department of Community Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Dongola, Dongola 41111, Sudan

3. Department of Community Health, School of Nursing, University of Embu, Embu 6-60100, Kenya

4. Faculty of Medicine, National University-Sudan, Khartoum 11115, Sudan

5. Department of Physiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Dongola, Dongola 41111, Sudan

Abstract

Background: Suboptimal health status (SHS) measurement has now been recognized as an essential construct in predictive, preventive, and personalized medicine. Currently, there are limited tools, and an ongoing debate about appropriate tools. Therefore, it is crucial to evaluate and generate conclusive evidence about the psychometric properties of available SHS tools. Objective: This research aimed to identify and critically assess the psychometric properties of available SHS instruments and provide recommendations for their future use. Methods: Articles were retrieved by following the guidelines of the PRISMA checklist, and the robustness of methods and evidence about the measurement properties was assessed using the adapted COSMIN checklist. The review was registered in PROSPERO. Results: The systematic review identified 14 publications describing four subjective SHS measures with established psychometric properties; these included the Suboptimal Health Status Questionnaire-25 (SHSQ-25), Sub-health Measurement Scale Version 1.0 (SHMS V1.0), Multidimensional Sub-health Questionnaire of Adolescents (MSQA), and the Sub-Health Self-Rating Scale (SSS). Most studies were conducted in China and reported three reliability indices: (1) the internal consistency measured by Cronbach’s α value ranged between 0.70 and 0.96; (2) the test–retest reliability; and (3) the split-half reliability coefficient values ranged between 0.64 and 0.98, and between 0.83 and 0.96, respectively. For the values of validity coefficients in the case of SHSQ-25 > 0.71, the SHMS-1.0 ranged from 0.64 to 0.87, and the SSS ranged from 0.74 to 0.96. Using these existing and well-characterized tools rather than constructing original tools is beneficial, given that the existing choice demonstrated sound psychometric properties and established norms. Conclusions: The SHSQ-25 stood out as being more suitable for the general population and routine health surveys, because it is short and easy to complete. Therefore, there is a need to adapt this tool by translating it into other languages, including Arabic, and establishing norms based on populations from other regions of the world.

Funder

University of Ha’il

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

Medicine (miscellaneous)

Reference48 articles.

1. Health as a Theoretical Concept;Boorse;Philos. Sci.,1977

2. W is for Wellbeing and the WHO definition of health;Misselbrook;Br. J. Gen. Pract.,2014

3. A systemic review of suboptimal health;Zhang;Glob. J. Public Health,2015

4. Development and Evaluation of a Questionnaire for Measuring Suboptimal Health Status in Urban Chinese;Yan;J. Epidemiol.,2009

5. A literature review on the conceptual framework of sub-health;Yang;Zhongguo Zhong Xi Yi Jie He Za Zhi,2010

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3