Comparison of Surgical Outcomes between Single-Port Laparoscopic Surgery and Da Vinci Single-Port Robotic Surgery

Author:

Kim Jeong-Min1,Lee Seon-Mi1ORCID,Seol Aeran1,Song Jae-Yun1,Ryu Ki-Jin1ORCID,Lee Sanghoon1ORCID,Park Hyun-Tae1,Cho Hyun-Woong2,Min Kyung-Jin3ORCID,Hong Jin-Hwa2,Lee Jae-Kwan2ORCID,Lee Nak-Woo3

Affiliation:

1. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Korea University College of Medicine, 73 Koreadae-ro, Seongbuk-gu, Seoul 02841, Republic of Korea

2. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Korea University College of Medicine, 148 Gurodong-ro, Guro-gu, Seoul 08308, Republic of Korea

3. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Korea University College of Medicine, 123 Jeokgeum-ro, Danwon-gu, Ansan-si 15355, Gyeonggi-do, Republic of Korea

Abstract

Background: The aim of this study is to compare the surgical outcomes of single-port laparoscopic surgery (SPLS) and single-port robotic surgery (SPRS). Methods: We retrospectively analyzed patients who underwent a hysterectomy, ovarian cystectomy, or myomectomy with SPLS or SPRS from January 2020 to July 2022. Statistical analyses were performed using the SPSS chi-square test and student’s t-test. Results: A total of 566 surgeries including single-port laparoscopic hysterectomy (SPLH; n = 148), single-port robotic hysterectomy (SPRH; n = 35), single-port laparoscopic ovarian cystectomy (SPLC; n = 207), single-port robotic ovarian cystectomy (SPRC; n = 108), single-port laparoscopic myomectomy (SPLM; n = 12), and single-port robotic myomectomy (SPRM; n = 56). The SPRH, SPRC, and SPRM groups had a shorter operation time than the SPLS group, although the results were not statistically significant (SPRH vs. SPLH, p = 0.134; SPRC vs. SPLC, p = 0.098; SPRM vs. SPLM, p = 0.202). Incisional hernia occurred as a postoperative complication in two patients only in the SPLH group. Postoperative Hb changes were lower in the SPRC and SPRM groups than in the SPLC and SPLM groups (SPRC vs. SPLC, p = 0.023; SPRM vs. SPLM, p = 0.010). Conclusions: Our study demonstrated that the SPRS had comparable surgical outcomes when compared to the SPLS. Therefore, the SPRS should be considered a feasible and safe option for gynecologic patients.

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

Medicine (miscellaneous)

Reference20 articles.

1. Role of Minimally Invasive Surgery in Gynecologic Oncology: An Updated Survey of Members of the Society of Gynecologic Oncology;Conrad;Int. J. Gynecol. Cancer,2015

2. Robotic Single-Site Hysterectomy versus Robot-Assisted Multiport Hysterectomy in Benign Gynecologic Diseases: A Retrospective Comparison of Clinical and Surgical Outcomes;Park;Soonchunhyang Med. Sci.,2018

3. Decline of open surgical experience for general surgery residents;Bingmer;Surg. Endosc.,2019

4. Current status of robotic surgery: What is different from laparoscopic surgery?;Choi;J. Korean Med. Assoc,2012

5. (2023, January 16). Single-Port Robotic Surgery Improves Patient Ratings of Scarring after Urologic Procedures. Available online: https://www.eurekalert.org/news-releases/968630.

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Soft tissue surgical robot for minimally invasive surgery: a review;Biomedical Engineering Letters;2023-10-13

2. Vaginal Cuff Dehiscence and a Guideline to Determine Treatment Strategy;Journal of Personalized Medicine;2023-05-24

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3