Introducing the Mellorater—The Five Domains Model in a Welfare Monitoring App for Animal Guardians

Author:

Wilkins Cristina L.1ORCID,McGreevy Paul D.2ORCID,Cosh Suzanne M.3ORCID,Henshall Cathrynne4ORCID,Jones Bidda25,Lykins Amy D.3,Billingsley William6ORCID

Affiliation:

1. School of Environmental and Rural Science, University of New England, Armidale, NSW 2353, Australia

2. Sydney School of Veterinary Science, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia

3. School of Psychology, The University of New England, Armidale, NSW 2353, Australia

4. School of Agricultural, Environmental and Veterinary Sciences, Charles Sturt University, Wagga Wagga, NSW 2678, Australia

5. Australian Alliance for Animals, 16 Goodhope Street, Paddington, NSW 2021, Australia

6. School of Science and Technology, University of New England, Armidale, NSW 2353, Australia

Abstract

When monitoring an animal’s welfare, it helps to have comprehensive and day-to-day information about the animal’s life. The goal is to ensure that animal guardians (carers, keepers, and owners) use such information to act in the animals’ best interests. This article introduces the Mellorater, an animal welfare monitoring app based on the 2020 Five Domains Model. This framework provides a means of capturing comprehensive information about the world in which individual animals exist. The Mellorater asks animal guardians to rate their agreement with 18 statements covering any focal animal’s nutrition, environment, health, and behavioural interactions using a five-point Likert scale. No specialist training is required other than following straightforward instructions on using the app, which are provided. The Mellorater is not proposed as a validated welfare auditing tool because it relies on reflective self-reporting and, thus, is vulnerable to the user’s subjectivity. If users’ subjectivity is stable over time, then the longitudinal data may be considered useful proxies for trends in quality of life. That said, it has the potential to be used by trained auditors if scientifically validated, species-specific indicators are applied. The Mellorater collects anonymous data and has been approved for a study to explore how the use of such scales may differ among guardians of different species and in different contexts. In this paper, we conduct the following: (1) summarise the app’s purposes; (2) clarify its capabilities and limitations; and (3) invite animal welfare scholars, veterinarians, health and welfare professionals, and animal guardians to use it.

Publisher

MDPI AG

Reference69 articles.

1. Saeri, A.K., and Grundy, E. (2023). Australian Animal Welfare Survey—2023 Summary Report, Monash University, Monash Sustainable Development Institute.

2. Affective States and the Assessment of Laboratory-induced Animal Welfare Impacts;Mellor;Altex Proc.,2012

3. Mellor, D.J. (2019). Welfare-aligned Sentience: Enhanced Capacities to Experience, Interact, Anticipate, Choose and Survive. Animals, 9.

4. Beausoleil, N.J., and Mellor, D.J. (2017). Validating indicators of sheep welfare. Achieving Sustainable Production of Sheep, Burleigh Dodds Science Publishing.

5. Bridgwater, G. (2024, July 20). Measuring Animal Welfare: Philosophical Foundations, Practical Indicators and Overall Assessments, Available online: https://www.animalask.org/post/measuring-animal-welfare.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3