Emergence from General Anaesthesia: Can We Discriminate between Emergence Delirium and Postoperative Pain?

Author:

Somaini Marta12,Engelhardt Thomas3,Ingelmo Pablo3456ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Anesthesia, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, 20162 Milano, Italy

2. Advanced Course Teacher Scuola di Specialità Anestesia e Rianimazione, Università degli Studi di Milano Bicocca, 20126 Milano, Italy

3. Department of Anesthesia, Montreal Children’s Hospital, McGill University, Montreal, QC H4A3J1, Canada

4. Edwards Family Interdisciplinary Center for Complex Pain, Montreal Children’s Hospital, Montreal, QC H4A3J1, Canada

5. Research Institute, McGill University Health Center, Montreal, QC H4A3J1, Canada

6. Alan Edwards Center for Research on Pain, McGill University, Montreal, QC H3A2B4, Canada

Abstract

Unsettled behaviors characterize the early phase after general anaesthesia in the pediatric population in up to 80% of cases. Emergence delirium (ED) and acute pain are the two most relevant sources of this phenomenon. Research and clinical guidelines are difficult to implement due to the variability of the definition of unsettled behavior and measurement of the different components. The most probable incidence of ED is between 10% and 20%, and the potential risk factors could be summarized as young age, male gender, preoperative anxiety, baseline sleep-disordered breathing, volatile anaesthesia and ENT or ophthalmologic surgery. Self-reporting behavioral and observational scales are unable to reliably differentiate between ED and pain in a child who is not fully awake, making correct treatment choices difficult. This may lead to an undertreatment of pain in agitated children or to the overuse of opioids for self-limiting ED. This paper considers the current knowledge on the identification and treatment of ED and pain and provides a pragmatic approach for daily practice.

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

Medicine (miscellaneous)

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3