Affiliation:
1. Department of Mining Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology, Indian School of Mines, Dhanbad 826 004, India
2. National Institute of Rock Mechanics, Bengaluru 560 070, India
Abstract
The Himalayan region has enormous potential for hydropower development. However, variations in geological and geotechnical conditions pose challenging tasks for the designers. If these variations are not tackled in a timely manner during underground excavations, especially for caverns, instabilities may occur, resulting in time and cost over-runs. For sustainable hydropower development, minimizing these over-runs is necessary. The modulus of deformation (Ed) of a rock mass is an essential input parameter required in the design of underground excavations. This study involves collecting the results of extensive in situ tested values for various hydroelectric projects in the Himalayan regions, along with the rock mass rating (RMR) values at 35 test sites. Ed is estimated empirically based on statistical analysis. Comparisons were made with the empirical equations already available in the literature, using RMR and the proposed equation for estimating Ed. Although different researchers have proposed many equations for estimating the value of Ed using RMR, a gap exists in validating such equations. In this regard, the proposed equation for Ed was verified by carrying out 3D numerical-modelling studies using FLAC3D, an explicit finite-difference software for an underground powerhouse cavern and comparing the displacement values with the field instrumentation data.
Subject
Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law,Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment,Geography, Planning and Development,Building and Construction
Reference60 articles.
1. IHA (International Hydropower Association) (2020). Hydropower Status Report: Sector Trends and Insights, International Hydropower Association.
2. CEA: HPMD (Central Electricity Authority: Hydro Project Monitoring Division) (2020). Progress of On-Going Hydro Electric Projects, Quarterly Review No. 100, January–March 2020, Central Electricity Authority.
3. Uncertainties-Based Potential Time and Cost Overrun Assessment While Planning a Hydropower Project;Kansal;ASCE-ASME J. Risk Uncertain. Eng. Syst. Part A Civ. Eng.,2022
4. Delineation of Cavity in Downstream Surge Chamber at Punatsangchhu-II Hydroelectric Project, Bhutan;Thapliyal;J. Geol. Res.,2019
5. Early Stages of Foreland Basin Evolution in the Lesser Himalaya, N India;Najman;Geol. Soc. Spec. Publ.,1993