Abstract
The structural attributes and correlates of items have an effect on their composite scores and exploring them strengthens the content validity of a measure adapted to another context. The objective of this study was to evaluate the item properties of a measure of psychosocial work factors (PWFs). Data were collected through a web platform from 188 Peruvian working adults (men = 101, 50.5%) holding various professions and jobs. The instrument was the Psychosocial Processes at Work Scale (PROPSIT), adapted for the Peruvian context. The distributional characteristics, the efficiency of its response options and its correlates with engagement, occupational self-efficacy, general stress and psychological distress (explored with a coefficient of maximum information and another of monotonic association) were analyzed. It was found that the items were asymmetrically distributed, without statistical normality and with a response tendency at low (for psychosocial risk factors (PSRFs)) and medium (favorable psychosocial resources) levels. The number of efficient response options was lower (approximately five options) than the original structure (seven options). The monotonic associations with gender and age were essentially zero and theoretically converged with the external constructs, except for some items related to job demands. The contributions of the results to the content validity of the PROPSIT and the orientation of working hypotheses about PROPSIT item constructs and measures of work effects are discussed.
Funder
Effects of mindfulness training on psychological distress and quality of life of the family caregiv-er
Subject
Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis,Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
Reference82 articles.
1. Journal article reporting standards for quantitative research in psychology: The APA Publications and Communications Board task force report.
2. Reporting Quantitative Research in Psychology: How to Meet APA Style Journal Article Reporting Standards;Cooper,2020
3. Essentials of Psychological Testing;Urbina,2014
4. Standards for Educational and Psychological Testing,2014
5. Factor analysis and discriminant validity: A brief review of some practical issues;Farrell;Proceedings of the ANZMAC 2009 Conference,2009
Cited by
5 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献