Abstract
(1) Background: This study investigated how potential shifts in patients’ formal and informal care utilization during the COVID-19 pandemic impacted their informal caregivers in terms of their subjective burden, psychological wellbeing, and happiness. (2) Methods: A retrospective cohort study design was employed for a panel of Dutch informal caregivers of persons with mental health problems (n = 219) in June 2020. Descriptive statistics and differences between means were determined for the patients’ informal and care utilization and informal caregivers’ subjective burden, happiness, and psychological wellbeing. Three mediation analyses were conducted using the PROCESS macro. (3) Results: Informal caregivers reported significantly worse happiness and subjective burden scores during the COVID-19 pandemic compared with before the lockdown. There were minimal shifts in patient’s care utilization reported, with the exception of a decrease in significant emotional and practical support provided by the informal caregiver. In the mediation analyses, there was not a significant indirect effect of shifts in patients’ formal care utilization on informal caregivers’ subjective burden, psychological wellbeing, and happiness through shifts in patients’ informal care utilization. (4) Discussion and conclusion: Whilst we found that shifts in patients’ care utilization during the first wave of the pandemic did not affect the informal caregiver in the short term, it is unclear what the long-term impact of the pandemic might be on informal caregivers. More research should be conducted to understand the implications of short- and long-term impact of substitution on informal caregivers of persons with mental health problems, with special consideration of the COVID-19 context and uptake of e-health technology.
Funder
Erasmus School of Health Policy and Management
Subject
Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis,Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
Reference73 articles.
1. Deinstitutionalisation of mental health care in the Netherlands: Towards an integrative approach;Ravelli;Int. J. Integr. Care,2006
2. Mental health care reform in the Netherlands;Schene;Acta Psychiatr. Scand.,2001
3. World Health Organization (2001). The World Health Report 2001–Mental Health: New Understanding, New Hope, World Health Organization. Available online: https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/42390.
4. Care-giving and the impact on carers of a community mental health service: PRiSM Psychosis Study 6;Szmukler;Br. J. Psychiatry,1998
5. Hoefman, R.J., Van Exel, N.J.A., and Brouwer, W.B.F. (2013). iVICQ: iMTA Valuation of Informal Care Questionnaire, Erasmus Universiteit Rotterdam. Available online: https://www.imta.nl/questionnaires/ivicq/documents/.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献