How Do Shifts in Patients with Mental Health Problems’ Formal and Informal Care Utilization Affect Informal Caregivers?: A COVID-19 Case Study

Author:

Bremmers Leonarda G. M.ORCID,Hakkaart-van Roijen Leona,Gräler Eleonora S.,Uyl-de Groot Carin A.,Fabbricotti Isabelle N.

Abstract

(1) Background: This study investigated how potential shifts in patients’ formal and informal care utilization during the COVID-19 pandemic impacted their informal caregivers in terms of their subjective burden, psychological wellbeing, and happiness. (2) Methods: A retrospective cohort study design was employed for a panel of Dutch informal caregivers of persons with mental health problems (n = 219) in June 2020. Descriptive statistics and differences between means were determined for the patients’ informal and care utilization and informal caregivers’ subjective burden, happiness, and psychological wellbeing. Three mediation analyses were conducted using the PROCESS macro. (3) Results: Informal caregivers reported significantly worse happiness and subjective burden scores during the COVID-19 pandemic compared with before the lockdown. There were minimal shifts in patient’s care utilization reported, with the exception of a decrease in significant emotional and practical support provided by the informal caregiver. In the mediation analyses, there was not a significant indirect effect of shifts in patients’ formal care utilization on informal caregivers’ subjective burden, psychological wellbeing, and happiness through shifts in patients’ informal care utilization. (4) Discussion and conclusion: Whilst we found that shifts in patients’ care utilization during the first wave of the pandemic did not affect the informal caregiver in the short term, it is unclear what the long-term impact of the pandemic might be on informal caregivers. More research should be conducted to understand the implications of short- and long-term impact of substitution on informal caregivers of persons with mental health problems, with special consideration of the COVID-19 context and uptake of e-health technology.

Funder

Erasmus School of Health Policy and Management

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis,Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Reference73 articles.

1. Deinstitutionalisation of mental health care in the Netherlands: Towards an integrative approach;Ravelli;Int. J. Integr. Care,2006

2. Mental health care reform in the Netherlands;Schene;Acta Psychiatr. Scand.,2001

3. World Health Organization (2001). The World Health Report 2001–Mental Health: New Understanding, New Hope, World Health Organization. Available online: https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/42390.

4. Care-giving and the impact on carers of a community mental health service: PRiSM Psychosis Study 6;Szmukler;Br. J. Psychiatry,1998

5. Hoefman, R.J., Van Exel, N.J.A., and Brouwer, W.B.F. (2013). iVICQ: iMTA Valuation of Informal Care Questionnaire, Erasmus Universiteit Rotterdam. Available online: https://www.imta.nl/questionnaires/ivicq/documents/.

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3