Agent-Based Modelling of Health Inequalities following the Complexity Turn in Public Health: A Systematic Review

Author:

Boyd Jennifer,Wilson Rebekah,Elsenbroich Corinna,Heppenstall Alison,Meier PetraORCID

Abstract

There is an increasing focus on the role of complexity in public health and public policy fields which has brought about a methodological shift towards computational approaches. This includes agent-based modelling (ABM), a method used to simulate individuals, their behaviour and interactions with each other, and their social and physical environment. This paper aims to systematically review the use of ABM to simulate the generation or persistence of health inequalities. PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science (1 January 2013–15 November 2022) were searched, supplemented with manual reference list searching. Twenty studies were included; fourteen of them described models of health behaviours, most commonly relating to diet (n = 7). Six models explored health outcomes, e.g., morbidity, mortality, and depression. All of the included models involved heterogeneous agents and were dynamic, with agents making decisions, growing older, and/or becoming exposed to different health risks. Eighteen models represented physical space and in eleven models, agents interacted with other agents through social networks. ABM is increasingly contributing to our understanding of the socioeconomic inequalities in health. However, to date, the majority of these models focus on the differences in health behaviours. Future research should attempt to investigate the social and economic drivers of health inequalities using ABM.

Funder

Medical Research Council

Chief Scientist Office

University of Sheffield and Wellcome Trust

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis,Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Reference46 articles.

1. Widening socioeconomic inequalities in mortality in six Western European countries;Mackenbach;Int. J. Epidemiol.,2003

2. The persistence of health inequalities in modern welfare states: The explanation of a paradox;Mackenbach;Soc. Sci. Med.,2012

3. Marmot, M., and Bell, R. (2006). Social Injustice and Public Health, Oxford University Press, INC.

4. Employment status, employment conditions, and limiting illness: Prospective evidence from the British household panel survey 1991–2001;Bartley;J. Epidemiol. Community Health,2004

5. Solar, O., Irwin, A.A., and Conceptual Framework for Action on the Social Determinants of Health (2022, August 10). Social Determinants of Health Discussion Paper 2 (Policy and Practice). Available online: http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/44489/1/9789241500852_eng.pdf?ua=1&ua=1.

Cited by 7 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3