Abstract
This longitudinal study examined the labor market affiliations of marginal part-time workers (<15 working hours/week) compared with full-time workers (32–40 working hours/week) within gender and age groups. Analyses were based on 1,492,187 Danish employees with marginal part-time or full-time work at baseline using register data of working hours and labor market affiliation from the Labor Market Account. We used the Expected Labor Market Affiliation method within gender and age groups to estimate the time spent in different labor market states over a 5-year follow-up from 2012–2017. The multistate model included five recurrent labor market states: work, unemployment, long-term sickness absence, studying, and temporarily out, and the results were adjusted for education level, morbidity, and ethnicity. A marginal part-time worker generally had fewer days of work without social benefits and spent more days studying during follow-up compared with a full-time worker. In addition, marginal part-time workers ≥ 25 years old had more days of unemployment and more days of long-term sickness absence. These findings suggest that marginal part-time workers have fewer paid workdays without social benefits compared with full-time workers, depending on age. Further studies should explore whether marginal part-time work is a stepping stone into or out of the labor market.
Subject
Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis,Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
Reference53 articles.
1. The Danish labor market, 2000–2020
2. Nordic Labour Market—Models in Open Markets;Andersen,2014
3. AKU240K: Beskæftigede Efter Arbejdstid, Alder Og Køn [AKU240K: Employees by Working Hours, Age and Sex]
https://www.statistikbanken.dk/AKU240K
4. Hybrid Work—Social Protection of Atypical Employment in Denmark;Mailand,2018
5. Living hours under pressure: flexibility loopholes in the Danish IR-model
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献