Climate Change Prevention through Community Actions and Empowerment: A Scoping Review
-
Published:2022-11-08
Issue:22
Volume:19
Page:14645
-
ISSN:1660-4601
-
Container-title:International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:IJERPH
Author:
Salvador Costa Maria1ORCID, Leitão Alexandra2, Silva Rosa3ORCID, Monteiro Vanessa14ORCID, Melo Pedro1ORCID
Affiliation:
1. Centre for Interdisciplinary Research in Health, Institute of Health Sciences, Universidade Católica Portuguesa, 4169-005 Porto, Portugal 2. Católica Porto Business School, Research Centre in Management and Economics, Universidade Católica Portuguesa, 4169-005 Porto, Portugal 3. Health Sciences Research Unit: Nursing (UICISA: E), Nursing School of Coimbra, Portugal Centre for Evidence Based Practice: A JBI Centre of Excellence, 3004-011 Coimbra, Portugal 4. Vila Real Community Care Unit 1, 5000-557 Vila Real, Portugal
Abstract
As society tries to tackle climate change around the globe, communities need to reduce its impact on human health. The purpose of this review is to identify key stakeholders involved in mitigating and adapting to climate change, as well as the type and characteristics of community empowerment actions implemented so far to address the problem. Published and unpublished studies from January 2005 to March 2022 in English and Portuguese were included in this review. The search, conducted on PubMed, CINAHL, Scopus, MEDLINE, Scopus, Web of Science, SciELO, and RCAAP (Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal), followed a three-step search strategy. Data extraction was performed by two independent reviewers, using an extraction tool specifically designed for the review questions. Twenty-seven studies were eligible for inclusion: six used interviews as a qualitative method, three were systematic reviews, three were case study analyses, three used surveys and questionnaires as quantitative methods, two used integrative baseline reviews, and three utilized a process model design. Six studies targeted local, public and private stakeholders. Community settings were the context target of fifteen studies, whereas twelve specifically referred to urban settings. Seven types of community actions were acknowledged across the globe, characterised as hybrid interventions and referring to the leading stakeholders: local governments, non-governmental organizations, civil society, universities, public health, and private sectors.
Funder
Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia
Subject
Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis,Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
Reference48 articles.
1. Pan American Health Organization (2020). Climate Change for Health Professionals—A Pocketbook, PAHO. 2. Capolongo, S., Rebecchi, A., Dettori, M., Appolloni, L., Azara, A., Buffoli, M., Capasso, L., Casuccio, A., Conti, G.O., and D’Amico, A. (2018). Healthy design and urban planning strategies, actions, and policy to achieve salutogenic cities. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, 15. 3. Jackson, P., and From Stockholm to Kyoto: A Brief History of Climate Change (2022, May 15). United Nations Website. Available online: https://www.un.org/en/chronicle/article/stockholm-kyoto-brief-history-climate-change. 4. United Nations (2022, June 14). UN Climate Change Conference UK 2021. Available online: https://ukcop26.org/. 5. Planetary boundaries: Guiding human development on a changing planet;Steffen;Science,2015
Cited by
18 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|