Higher Risk of Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome and Risk Factors among Patients with COVID-19: A Systematic Review, Meta-Analysis and Meta-Regression

Author:

Tsai Yi-TsengORCID,Ku Han-ChangORCID,Maithreepala Sujeewa Dilhani,Tsai Yi-Jing,Chen Li-Fan,Ko Nai-YingORCID,Konara Mudiyanselage Sriyani PadmalathaORCID

Abstract

Objective: To estimate the global risk and risk factors associated with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) among patients with COVID-19: Design: A systematic review, meta-analysis and meta-regression. Setting and Participants: Hospitals or nursing homes and patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome after COVID-19. Methods: The literature review was systematically conducted on Embase, MEDLINE, CINAHL, and Web of Science, in addition to manual searches and reference list checking from 1 January 2019 to 2 March 2022. The search terms included coronavirus, acute respiratory syndrome, acute respiratory distress syndrome and observational studies. Three reviewers independently appraised the quality of the studies and extracted the relevant data using the Joanna Briggs Institute abstraction form and critical appraisal tools. A study protocol was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42022311957). Eligible studies were meta-analyzed and underwent meta-regression. Results: A total of 12 studies were included, with 148,080 participants. The risk ratio (RR) of ARDS was 23%. Risk factors were age ≥ 41–64 years old (RR = 15.3%, 95% CI =0.14−2.92, p = 0.03); fever (RR = 10.3%, 95% CI = 0.03−2.03, p = 0.04); multilobe involvement of the chest (RR = 33.5%, 95% CI = 0.35–6.36, p = 0.02); lymphopenia (RR = 25.9%, 95% CI = 1.11–4.08, p = 0.01); mechanical ventilation with oxygen therapy (RR = 31.7%, 95% CI = 1.10–5.25, p = 0.002); European region (RR = 16.3%, 95% CI = 0.09–3.17, p = 0.03); sample size ≤ 500 (RR = 18.0%, 95% CI = 0.70–2.89, p = 0.001). Conclusions and Implications: One in four patients experienced ARDS after having COVID-19. The age group 41–64 years old and the European region were high-risk groups. These findings can be used by policymakers to allocate resources for respiratory care facilities and can also provide scientific evidence in the design of protocols to manage COVID-19 worldwide.

Funder

An Nan Hospital, China Medical University, Tainan, Taiwan

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis,Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3