Abstract
Medical research literacy (MRL) is a facet of health literacy that measures a person’s understanding of informed consent and other aspects of participation in medical research. While existing research on MRL is limited, there are reasons to believe MRL may be associated with a willingness to participate in medical research. We use data from a racially balanced sample of survey respondents (n = 410): (1) to analyze how MRL scores vary by respondents’ socio-demographic characteristics; (2) to examine how MRL relates to respondents’ expressed likelihood to participate in a clinical trial; and (3) to provide considerations on the measurement of MRL. The results indicate no differences in MRL scores by race or gender; younger (p < 0.05) and more educated (p < 0.001) individuals have significantly higher MRL scores. Further, higher MRL scores are associated with significantly lower levels of expressed likelihood to participate in a clinical trial. Additionally, the MRL scale included both true and false statements, and analyses demonstrate significant differences in how these relate to outcomes. Altogether, the results signal that further research is needed to understand MRL and how it relates to socio-demographic characteristics associated with research participation and can be measured effectively.
Funder
NIMHD
National Science Foundation
University of Wisconsin-Madison Office of the Vice Chancellor for Research and Graduate Education with funding from the Wisconsin Alumni Research Foundation to Jennifer Dykema
College of Letters and Science at the University of Wisconsin-Madison, and the facilities of the Social Science Computing Cooperative and the Center for Demography and Ecology
Subject
Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis,Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
Reference30 articles.
1. Conceptualizing the Role of Research Literacy in Advancing Societal Health;J. Health Psychol.,2011
2. Henderson, G.E., Churchill, L.R., Davis, A.M., Easter, M.M., Grady, C., Joffe, S., Kass, N., King, N.M.P., Lidz, C.W., and Miller, F.G. (2007). Clinical Trials and Medical Care: Defining the Therapeutic Misconception. PLOS Med., 4.
3. Practice full report: Updating health literacy for healthy people 2030: Defining its importance for a new decade in public health;J. Public Health Manag. Pract.,2021
4. Senders, A. (2014). The importance of research literacy. Nat. Med. J., 6, Available online: https://www.naturalmedicinejournal.com/journal/importance-research-literacy.
5. Modelling health literacy on conceptualizations of scientific literacy;Health Promot. Int.,2020
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献