Abstract
Introduction. Data science is becoming increasingly prominent in the medical profession, in the face of the COVID-19 pandemic, presenting additional challenges and opportunities for medical education. We retrospectively appraised the existing biomedical informatics (BMI) and biostatistics courses taught to students enrolled in a six-year medical program. Methods. An anonymous cross-sectional survey was conducted among 121 students in their fourth year, with regard to the courses they previously attended, in contrast with the ongoing emergency medicine (EM) course during the first semester of the academic year 2020–2021, when all activities went online. The questionnaire included opinion items about courses and self-assessed knowledge, and questions probing into the respondents’ familiarity with the basics of data science. Results. Appreciation of the EM course was high, with a median (IQR) score of 9 (7–10) on a scale from 1 to 10. The overall scores for the BMI and biostatistics were 7 (5–9) and 8 (5–9), respectively. These latter scores were strongly correlated (Spearman correlation coefficient R = 0.869, p < 0.001). We found no correlation between measured and self-assessed knowledge of data science (R = 0.107, p = 0.246), but the latter was fairly and significantly correlated with the perceived usefulness of the courses. Conclusions. The keystone of this different perception of EM versus data science was the courses’ apparent value to the medical profession. The following conclusions could be drawn: (a) objective assessments of residual knowledge of the basics of data science do not necessarily correlate with the students’ subjective appraisal and opinion of the field or courses; (b) medical students need to see the explicit connection between interdisciplinary or complementary courses and the medical profession; and (c) courses on information technology and data science would better suit a distributed approach across the medical curriculum.
Subject
Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis,Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
Reference47 articles.
1. (2022, July 22). European Commission Digital Education Action Plan (2021–2027)|European Education Area. Available online: https://education.ec.europa.eu/focus-topics/digital-education/action-plan.
2. Blended Learning Compared to Traditional Learning in Medical Education: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis;Blacher;J. Med. Internet Res.,2020
3. van Dam, P.J., Griffin, P., Peterson, G.M., Reeves, N.S., Kirkwood, L., and Prior, S.J. (2020). Organizational Support in Healthcare Redesign Education: A Mixed-Methods Exploratory Study of Expert Coach and Executive Sponsor Experiences. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, 17.
4. Zhong, J., Li, Z., Hu, X., Wang, L., and Chen, Y. (2022). Effectiveness Comparison between Blended Learning of Histology Practical in Flipped Physical Classrooms and Flipped Virtual Classrooms for MBBS Students. BMC Med. Educ., 22.
5. Bridging the Gap from Student to Doctor: Developing Coaches for the Transition to Residency;Winkel;Med. Educ. Online,2023
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献