Criteria and Guidelines for Human-Centered Work Design in a Digitally Transformed World of Work: Findings from a Formal Consensus Process

Author:

Tegtmeier PatriciaORCID,Weber Corinna,Sommer Sabine,Tisch AnitaORCID,Wischniewski SaschaORCID

Abstract

With the increasing digital transformation, work tasks are changing—in some cases, significantly. Our study addresses the question of whether the established criteria for work design are still sufficient or if they should get updated and additional criteria become necessary in the context of digitalization. In a multistage consensus process involving interdisciplinary groups of experts, we have identified specific criteria for the humane design of work in a world increasingly permeated by digitalized work tools. Starting with an expert workshop using a combined nominal group/focus group technique, followed by a real-time Delphi study, a content analysis and a five-stage peer comment process, we detected 13 criteria and 38 design guidelines for human-centered work in digital transformation. Mapping these with established criteria, it became apparent that some established criteria have experienced a new dynamic because of the digital transformation. For other criteria, a need for digitization-sensitive design is discernible. In addition, criteria have emerged whose necessity is rooted in the digital transformation. A diffusion and stronger interconnection of the various levels of the work system in connection with the digital transformation of work is apparent.

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis,Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Reference134 articles.

1. Beyond the Hype: A Bibliometric Analysis Deconstructing Research on Digitalization;Technol. Innov. Manag. Rev.,2019

2. A Socio-Technical Perspective on the Digital Era: The Lowlands view;Eur. J. Workplace Innov.,2019

3. How Technology Is Changing Work and Organizations;Annu. Rev. Organ. Psychol. Organ. Behav.,2016

4. Rosen, P.H., Donoghue, R., Heinold, E., Moore, P., Niehaus, S., and Wischniewski, S. (2022). Cognitive Automation: Implications for Occupational Safety and Health, European Agency for Safety and Health at Work. EU-OSHA Report.

5. Rea, P., Ottaviano, E., Machado, J., and Antosz, K. (2021). Design, Applications, and Maintenance of Cyber-Physical Systems, IGI Global.

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3