Abstract
Social homogeneity, understood as the similarity of perceptions and attitudes that individuals display toward the environment around them, is explained by the relational context in which they are immersed. However, there is no consensus about which relational mechanism best explains social homogeneity. The purpose of this research is to find out which of the three classical relational processes most studied in network analysis (structural cohesion, role equivalence, or homophily) is more determinant in explaining social homogeneity. To achieve the research objective, 110 professionals (psychologists, social workers, and community facilitators) implementing a psychosocial care program in three regions of Northwest Colombia were interviewed. Different types of relationships among professionals were analyzed using network analysis techniques. To examine the structural cohesion hypothesis, interveners were categorized according to the level of structural cohesion by performing core-periphery analysis in the networks evaluated; to test the role equivalence hypothesis, participants were categorized according to their level of degree centrality in the networks examined; to test the homophily hypothesis, participants were grouped according to the level of homophily in terms of professional profile. The non-parametric tests showed that role equivalence was the most powerful mechanism for explaining social homogeneity in the sample of psychosocial interveners evaluated.
Funder
Research Center for Development and Innovation at Universidad Pontificia Bolivariana
Universidad Tecnológica de Bolívar
Subject
Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis,Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
Reference73 articles.
1. Olson, J.M., and Maio, G.R. Attitudes in social behavior. Handbook of Psychology, 2003.
2. Smeesters, D., Wheeler, S.C., and Kay, A.C. Indirect prime-to-behavior. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 2010.
3. Nature and operation of attitudes;Ajzen;Annu. Rev. Psychol.,2001
4. Eagly, A.H., and Chaiken, S. Attitude Structure and Function. Handbook of Social Psychology, 1998.
5. Social cognition and social perception;Higgins;Annu. Rev. Psychol.,1987