Abstract
Including sex and gender considerations in health research is considered essential by many funders and is very useful for policy makers, program developers, clinicians, consumers and other end users. While longstanding confusions and conflations of terminology in the sex and gender field are well documented, newer conceptual confusions and conflations continue to emerge. Contemporary social demands for improved health and equity, as well as increased interest in precision healthcare and medicine, have made obvious the need for sex and gender science, sex and gender-based analyses (SGBA+), considerations of intersectionality, and equity, diversity and inclusion initiatives (EDI) to broaden representation among participants and diversify research agendas. But without a shared and precise understanding of these conceptual areas, fields of study, and approaches and their inter-relationships, more conflation and confusion can occur. This article sets out these areas and argues for more precise operationalization of sex- and gender-related factors in health research and policy initiatives in order to advance these varied agendas in mutually supportive ways.
Subject
Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis,Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
Reference58 articles.
1. Sex & Gender Science (SGS)
https://cogsresearch.ca/
2. Gendered Innovations in Science, Health & Medicine, Engineering, and Environment, 2011–2020
https://genderedinnovations.stanford.edu
3. Science Is Better with Sex and Gender: Strategic Plan 2018–2023
https://cihr-irsc.gc.ca/e/documents/igh_strategic_plan_2018-2023-e.pdf
4. Women and Health Research: Ethical and Legal Issues of Including Women in Clinical Studies;Mastroianni,1994
5. European Medicines Agency policies for clinical trials leave women unprotected
Cited by
35 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献