Abstract
(1) Background: Onsite clinics are increasingly common features of corporate health promotion programs. These clinics allow employers to offer convenient care to employees at their workplaces, which can lead to reduced healthcare expenditure and improved productivity. The objective of this study was to build basic data by qualitatively exploring employees’ experiences and perspectives on onsite clinics in a semiconductor company, as one part of the project to examine and improve the health management system of a large semiconductor company in Korea. (2) Methods: This study adopted the methodology of “Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research” (COREQ-32 checklist). Semi-structured interviews were conducted for this study over a two-month period. For data analysis, a codebook was developed and the constant comparative method was used. (3) Results: Most employees perceived convenience and a sense of belonging as the benefits of onsite clinics, while barriers to the use of onsite clinics included a lack of communication, concerns about confidentiality, and a provider-centered system. Promotion of onsite clinic services and affiliated physicians, employee-centered service provisions, and trust-building in healthcare information privacy were considered necessary to strengthen the role of onsite clinics as a primary care provider in the workplace. (4) Conclusions: The results of this qualitative study help us to gain a better understanding of employees’ perspectives on the onsite clinic’s service and roles.
Funder
Samsung Ombudsperson Commission
Subject
Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis,Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
Reference41 articles.
1. The Ottawa Charter for Health Promotion. Adopted on 21 November 1986http://www.who.int/healthpromotion/conferences/previous/ottawa/en/index.html
2. Key ingredients of SCM and examples in the health management market;Reynolds;Employ Health Manag. eNews,2005
3. Recent experience in health promotion at Johnson & Johnson: Lower health spending, strong return on investment;Henke;Health Aff.,2011
4. The Impact of an Integrated Population Health Enhancement and Disease Management Program on Employee Health Risk, Health Conditions, and Productivity