Analysis of the Face Mask Use by Public Transport Passengers and Workers during the COVID-19 Pandemic

Author:

Shashina Ekaterina A.ORCID,Sannikova Ekaterina A.ORCID,Shcherbakov Denis V.ORCID,Zhernov Yury V.ORCID,Makarova Valentina V.ORCID,Isiutina-Fedotkova Tatiana S.,Zabroda Nadezhda N.,Belova Elena V.ORCID,Ermakova Nina A.ORCID,Khodykina Tatiana M.ORCID,Skopin Anton Yu.,Sukhov Vitaly A.ORCID,Klimova Anna A.ORCID,Turnic Tamara NikolicORCID,Yakushina Irina I.ORCID,Manerova Olga A.ORCID,Reshetnikov Vladimir A.,Mitrokhin Oleg V.ORCID

Abstract

(1) Background: The use of face masks and gloves in public places directly shows the commitment of the population to the established regulations. Public transport is one of the most-at-risk places of contamination. The aim of the study was to analyze the face mask use by public transport passengers and workers during the COVID-19 pandemic. (2) Methods: Public transport passengers and workers were surveyed. Periodic intermittent selective observation was used to gauge the level of adherence to the established regulations among public transport passengers. Factor analysis was used to identify factors determining the face-mask-wearing comfort. (3) Results: The majority of passengers (87.5%) and all transport workers (100%) used face masks and gloves. Most of the users wore only face masks. Only 41.6% of passengers and 74.7% of transport workers wore face masks correctly. Motivational attitudes at the implementation of preventive measures were determined: established regulations in the public place (55.8%) and the protection of one’s own health and the health of family members (44.2%). Only 22.5% of those wearing face masks believed that doing so will have any effect on the spread of an infectious disease, and 10.8% wore masks to maintain the health of people around themselves. A low level of social responsibility was demonstrated. For 53.4% of workers, face mask wearing was uncomfortable. The majority of workers had adverse reactions to mask wearing: feeling short of breath (52.8%), hyperemia of face skin (33.8%), and facial hyperhidrosis (67.4%). (4) Conclusions: The comfort of wearing a mask is determined by adverse reactions occurrence, the properties of the mask, working conditions, and the duration of wearing the face mask. It is necessary to develop recommendations to reduce wearing discomfort. These recommendations, along with methods of raising the social responsibility of the population, can contribute to a greater commitment of the population to non-specific prevention measures.

Funder

Faculty of Medical Sciences, University of Kragujevac, Serbia

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis,Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Reference59 articles.

1. Self-isolation measures during the COVID-19 pandemic in the context of personal social responsibility;Karpova;Bull. Omsk Univ. Ser. Psychol.,2020

2. Low, L.L., Tong, S.F., Ang, J.Y., Abdullah, Z., Hamid, M.A., Risman, M.S., Wong, Y.T., Jamalul-Lail, N.I., Chelladorai, K., Tan, Y.P., Social responsibility perspective in public response to the COVID-19 pandemic: A grounded theory approach. BMC Public Health, 2022. 22.

3. Pandemic uncertainty and socially responsible investments;Zhu;Front. Public Health,2021

4. Medical mask as a means of personal and collective protection in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic (cross-cultural aspects);Burkova;Her. Anthropol.,2020

5. Risk, ritual and health responsibilisation: Japan’s “safety blanket” of surgical face mask-wearing;Burgess;Sociol. Health Illn.,2012

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3