Analysis of the Face Mask Use by Public Transport Passengers and Workers during the COVID-19 Pandemic
-
Published:2022-11-01
Issue:21
Volume:19
Page:14285
-
ISSN:1660-4601
-
Container-title:International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:IJERPH
Author:
Shashina Ekaterina A.ORCID, Sannikova Ekaterina A.ORCID, Shcherbakov Denis V.ORCID, Zhernov Yury V.ORCID, Makarova Valentina V.ORCID, Isiutina-Fedotkova Tatiana S., Zabroda Nadezhda N., Belova Elena V.ORCID, Ermakova Nina A.ORCID, Khodykina Tatiana M.ORCID, Skopin Anton Yu., Sukhov Vitaly A.ORCID, Klimova Anna A.ORCID, Turnic Tamara NikolicORCID, Yakushina Irina I.ORCID, Manerova Olga A.ORCID, Reshetnikov Vladimir A., Mitrokhin Oleg V.ORCID
Abstract
(1) Background: The use of face masks and gloves in public places directly shows the commitment of the population to the established regulations. Public transport is one of the most-at-risk places of contamination. The aim of the study was to analyze the face mask use by public transport passengers and workers during the COVID-19 pandemic. (2) Methods: Public transport passengers and workers were surveyed. Periodic intermittent selective observation was used to gauge the level of adherence to the established regulations among public transport passengers. Factor analysis was used to identify factors determining the face-mask-wearing comfort. (3) Results: The majority of passengers (87.5%) and all transport workers (100%) used face masks and gloves. Most of the users wore only face masks. Only 41.6% of passengers and 74.7% of transport workers wore face masks correctly. Motivational attitudes at the implementation of preventive measures were determined: established regulations in the public place (55.8%) and the protection of one’s own health and the health of family members (44.2%). Only 22.5% of those wearing face masks believed that doing so will have any effect on the spread of an infectious disease, and 10.8% wore masks to maintain the health of people around themselves. A low level of social responsibility was demonstrated. For 53.4% of workers, face mask wearing was uncomfortable. The majority of workers had adverse reactions to mask wearing: feeling short of breath (52.8%), hyperemia of face skin (33.8%), and facial hyperhidrosis (67.4%). (4) Conclusions: The comfort of wearing a mask is determined by adverse reactions occurrence, the properties of the mask, working conditions, and the duration of wearing the face mask. It is necessary to develop recommendations to reduce wearing discomfort. These recommendations, along with methods of raising the social responsibility of the population, can contribute to a greater commitment of the population to non-specific prevention measures.
Funder
Faculty of Medical Sciences, University of Kragujevac, Serbia
Subject
Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis,Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
Reference59 articles.
1. Self-isolation measures during the COVID-19 pandemic in the context of personal social responsibility;Karpova;Bull. Omsk Univ. Ser. Psychol.,2020 2. Low, L.L., Tong, S.F., Ang, J.Y., Abdullah, Z., Hamid, M.A., Risman, M.S., Wong, Y.T., Jamalul-Lail, N.I., Chelladorai, K., Tan, Y.P., Social responsibility perspective in public response to the COVID-19 pandemic: A grounded theory approach. BMC Public Health, 2022. 22. 3. Pandemic uncertainty and socially responsible investments;Zhu;Front. Public Health,2021 4. Medical mask as a means of personal and collective protection in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic (cross-cultural aspects);Burkova;Her. Anthropol.,2020 5. Risk, ritual and health responsibilisation: Japan’s “safety blanket” of surgical face mask-wearing;Burgess;Sociol. Health Illn.,2012
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|