Input Behavior of Farmer Production Factors in the Range of Asian Elephant Distribution: Survey Data from 1264 Households in Yunnan Province, China
-
Published:2023-11-18
Issue:11
Volume:15
Page:1147
-
ISSN:1424-2818
-
Container-title:Diversity
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Diversity
Author:
Liu Beimeng1, Du Yuchen1, Zhao Mengyuan1, Xie Yi1ORCID
Affiliation:
1. School of Economics and Management, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing 100083, China
Abstract
This article, based on the sustainable livelihood framework and survey data from 1264 households in Xishuangbanna Dai Autonomous Prefecture, Puer City, and Lincang City in Yunnan Province, China, analyzes the impact mechanism of livelihood capital on the production input behavior of farmers affected by Asian elephant damage and the moderating effect of Asian elephant damage on this process using ordinary least squares (OLS) models. The study finds the following: (1) Asian elephant damage has a significant negative effect on farmers’ production input, meaning that as the severity of Asian elephant damage increases, farmers reduce their input into agricultural production factors. (2) Livelihood capital has a significant positive effect on farmers’ production input, and both the increment and stock of livelihood capital promote an increase in farmers’ production input. (3) Asian elephant damage strengthens the influence of livelihood capital on farmers’ inputs of agricultural production factors. Based on these findings, four recommendations are proposed: emphasizing the cultivation and enhancement of farmers’ livelihood capital, improving strategies for managing and preventing wildlife damage, optimizing the economic compensation mechanism for human–wildlife conflicts, and adhering to sustainable development and resource allocation. These recommendations aim to enhance wildlife conservation and management policies, strengthen farmers’ risk-coping capabilities, and ensure the sustainability of agricultural production and livelihoods.
Funder
General Project of the National Social Science Foundation of China “Research on adaptive Governance Model and Mechanism Innovation of Human-Wildlife Conflict in National Parks Based on CAS Theory”
Subject
Nature and Landscape Conservation,Agricultural and Biological Sciences (miscellaneous),Ecological Modeling,Ecology
Reference60 articles.
1. Gross, E., Jayasinghe, N., Brooks, A., Polet, G., Wadhwa, R., and Hilderink-Koopmans, F. (2021). A Future for All: The Need for Human–Wildlife Coexistence, WWF. 2. Human–wildlife conflict and coexistence;Nyhus;Annu. Rev. Environ. Resour.,2016 3. Mapping attack hotspots to mitigate human–carnivore conflict: Approaches and applications of spatial predation risk modeling;Miller;Biodivers. Conserv.,2015 4. Van Eeden, L.M., Eklund, A., Miller, J.R.B., López-Bao, J.V., Chapron, G., Cejtin, M.R., Crowther, M., Dickman, C., Frank, J., and Krofel, M. (2018). Carnivore conservation needs evidence-based livestock protection. PLoS Biol., 16. 5. The African elephant and food security in Africa: Experiences from Baringo District, Kenya;Amwata;Pachyderm,2014
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|