Examining the Quasi-Static Uniaxial Compressive Behaviour of Commercial High-Performance Epoxy Matrices
Author:
Gargiuli J. F.1, Quino G.12ORCID, Board R.1, Griffith J. C.1ORCID, Shaffer M. S. P.3, Trask R. S.1ORCID, Hamerton I.1ORCID
Affiliation:
1. Bristol Composites Institute, School of Civil, Aerospace, and Design Engineering, Faculty of Science and Engineering, University of Bristol, Queen’s Building, University Walk, Bristol BS8 1TR, UK 2. Department of Aeronautics, Imperial College London, South Kensington Campus, London SW7 2AZ, UK 3. Department of Materials and Department of Chemistry, Imperial College London, South Kensington Campus, London SW7 2AZ, UK
Abstract
Four commercial high-performance aerospace aromatic epoxy matrices, CYCOM®890, CYCOM®977-2, PR520, and PRISM EP2400, were cured to a standardised 2 h, 180 °C cure cycle and evaluated in quasi-static uniaxial compression, as well as by dynamic scanning calorimetry (DSC) and thermogravimetric analysis (TGA). The thermoplastic toughened CYCOM®977-2 formulation displayed an overall increase in true axial stress values across the entire stress–strain curve relative to the baseline CYCOM®890 sample. The particle-toughened PR520 sample exhibited an overall decrease in true axial stress values past the yield point of the material. The PRISM EP2400 resin, with combined toughening agents, led to true axial stress values across the entire plastic region of the stress–strain curve, which were in line with the stress values observed with the CYCOM®890 material. Interestingly, for all formulations, the dilation angles (associated with the volume change during plastic deformation), recorded at 0.3 plastic strain, were close to 0°, with the variations reflecting the polymer structure. Compression data collected for this series of commercial epoxy resins are in broad agreement with a selection of model epoxy resins based on di- and tetra-functional monomers, cured with polyamines or dicarboxylic anhydrides. However, the fully formulated resins demonstrate a significantly higher compressive modulus than the model resins, albeit at the expense of yield stress.
Funder
UK Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC) programme
Subject
Polymers and Plastics,General Chemistry
Reference33 articles.
1. Effects of fiber and matrix properties on the compression strength of carbon fiber reinforced polymer composites;Li;New Carbon Mater.,2020 2. Chen, W., Liu, Y., Jiang, Z., Tang, L., Liu, Z., and Zhou, L. (2019). Modeling of compressive strength for unidirectional fiber reinforced composites with nanoparticle modified epoxy matrix. Materials, 12. 3. Huang, Y., Hunston, D.L., Kinloch, A.J., and Riew, C.K. (1993). Toughened Plastics I: Science and Engineering, American Chemical Society. Chapter 1. 4. Van Velthem, P., Gabriel, S., Pardoen, T., Bailly, C., and Ballout, W. (2021). Synergy between phenoxy and CSR tougheners on the fracture toughness of highly crosslinked epoxy-based composites. Polymers, 13. 5. Structure-property relations of 55 nm particle-toughened epoxy;Le;Polymer,2010
|
|