Effect of Artificial Aging of Peel Adhesion of Self-Adhesive Tapes on Different Construction Surfaces-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Effect of Artificial Aging of Peel Adhesion of Self-Adhesive Tapes on Different Construction Surfaces

Published:2023-08-03 Issue:15 Volume:13 Page:8947
ISSN:2076-3417
Container-title:Applied Sciences
language:en
Short-container-title:Applied Sciences

Author:

Dobilaitė Vaida¹,Jucienė Milda¹^ORCID,Banionis Karolis¹^ORCID,Kumžienė Jurga¹^ORCID,Paukštys Valdas¹,Stonkuvienė Aurelija¹,Miškinis Kęstutis¹

Affiliation:

1. Institute of Architecture and Construction, Kaunas University of Technology, Tunelio st. 60, LT-44405 Kaunas, Lithuania

Abstract

It is important to develop research on sealing materials in order to find effective solutions to ensure the energy efficiency of buildings. The aim of this study is to investigate the peel adhesion of single-sided self-adhesive tapes to different construction surfaces and to determine the change in this characteristic due to climatic effects. Different construction tapes, mostly used externally in buildings, are glued to different substrates. The artificial aging of test samples was carried out, simulating the effects of moisture, heat, and cold; the intensity, duration, and sequence of the cyclic effects were determined, taking into account the statistical climatological data of the middle-latitude climate zone. The peel adhesion of the tapes was determined before and after different numbers of artificial aging cycles. The results show that the peel adhesion range is very wide, from 11 to 61 N/24 mm. In most cases, a lower-rated peeling adhesion was obtained by peeling the tape from plastered cement–sawdust board. The change in peel adhesion depends more on the surface to which the tape is glued than it does on the number of climatic exposure cycles selected for the test.

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes,Computer Science Applications,Process Chemistry and Technology,General Engineering,Instrumentation,General Materials Science

Link

https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/13/15/8947/pdf

Reference36 articles.

1. Price, S., Baines, A., and Jennings, P. (2023, May 08). Good Practice Guide to Airtightness. Available online: https://www.passivhaustrust.org.uk/guidance_detail.php?gId=48.

2. Carrié, F.R., Jobert, R., and Leprince, V. (2012). Contributed Report 14. Methods and Techniques for Airtight Buildings, International energy agency.

3. Finch, G., Wang, J., and Ricketts, D. (2013). Guide for Designing Energy-Efficient Building Enclosures for Wood-Frame Multi-Unit Residential Buildings in Marine to Cold Climates Zones in North America, FPInnovations.

4. (2018). Building Enclosures. Walls, Roofs, Windows and Exterior Entrance Doors. Adopted on 29 March 2019 by order No. D1-186. Standard No. Building Technical Regulation STR 2.04.01:2018. (In Lithuanian).

5. Kalbe, K., Piikov, H., Kesti, J., Honkakoski, E., Kurnitski, J., and Kalamees, T. (2020, January 6–9). Moisture dry-out from steel faced insulated sandwich panels. Proceedings of the E3S Web Conferences, 12th Nordic Symposium on Building Physics (NSB 2020), Tallinn, Estonia.