Researching Gender and Disasters of Natural Origin: Ethical Challenges

Author:

Dema Moreno Sandra1ORCID,Alonso Moro María Teresa1ORCID,Cocina Díaz Virginia1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Sociology, University of Oviedo, 33006 Oviedo, Spain

Abstract

Ethical issues are very relevant in the field of women’s, gender and/or feminist studies. The aim of this article is to highlight the ethical challenges faced by the authors in their research process, with specific reference to two projects on gender and disasters in which they have been involved. In general, we try to avoid sexist bias throughout the complete research process, from the definition of the objectives themselves to the methodology design, where we ensure diversity in the selection of participants in order to take into consideration the variety of voices present in society, especially those of women. Also, when developing our research, we take into account the power relationships involved, both between those who participate in the fieldwork and with the researchers themselves. To counteract the effects of such relations, we have considered people’s wellbeing and the humanization of the whole process. Finally, when it comes to the dissemination of the results and their transfer to society at large, we follow the same principles and actively integrate the people involved. Considering these issues benefits the research process and makes the resultant knowledge more ethical and socially useful, in addition to promoting more egalitarian gender relations.

Funder

Spanish Research Agency

“Severo Ochoa” Doctoral Scholarship Programme of the Principality of Asturias

Publisher

MDPI AG

Reference27 articles.

1. Miller, T., Birch, M., Mauthner, M., and Jessop, J. (2012). Ethics in Qualitative Research, Sage. [2nd ed.].

2. Eichler, M. (1991). Nonsexist Research Methods: A Practical Guide, Routledge. [1st ed.].

3. Harding, S. (1986). The Science Question in Feminism, Cornell University Press. [1st ed.].

4. Burke, M.A., and Eichler, M. (2006). The Bias Free Framework: A Practical Tool for Identifying and Eliminating Social Biases in Health Research, Global Forum for Health Research. [1st ed.].

5. Interviewing Women Again: Power, Time and the Gift;Oakley;Sociology,2016

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3