Affiliation:
1. Department of History, Humanities, and Languages, University of Houston-Downtown, Houston, TX 77002, USA
Abstract
In this paper, I examine Johannes de Silentio’s presentation of the faith of Abraham, deriving therefrom a new way of conceiving his notion of faith as a paradoxical co-inhabiting of both the aesthetic and the ethical stages, rather than as a rejection, synthesis, or overcoming of them. Relying largely upon Silentio’s account of Abraham’s faith as anxious but not doubting, I argue that the interpretations of Fear and Trembling by Alastair Hannay and Mark C. Taylor fail to account for some essential aspects of Silentio’s depiction. I conclude that faith, as it is described in Fear and Trembling, cannot be philosophically understood as it is not an object for thought but an existential perspective one lives.
Reference29 articles.
1. Hong, H.V., and Hong, E.H. (1983). Fear and Trembling and Repetition, Princeton University Press.
2. Cappelørn, N.J. (1997). Søren Kierkegaards Skrifter, Gads Forlag.
3. Absolute Action: Divine Hiddenness in Kierkegaard’s Fear and Trembling;Kline;Mod. Theol.,2012
4. Teleological Suspensions in Fear and Trembling;McDaniel;Philos. Phenomenol. Res.,2020
5. Abraham, and Teleological Suspensions;Hudson;Monist,2021