Affiliation:
1. School of Humanities, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW 2006, Australia
Abstract
In this paper, I approach Hegel’s philosophy under the banner of a “Keplerian Revolution”, the implicit reference being, of course, to Kant’s supposed Copernican philosophical revolution. Kepler had been an early supporter of the Copernican paradigm in astronomy, but went well beyond his predecessor, and so is invoked here in an attempt to capture some of the important ways in which Hegel attempted to go beyond the philosophy of Kant. To make these issues more determinate, however, Hegel’s Keplerian orientation will not be presented in its contrast to Kant’s “Copernicanism” as such, but as contrasted with that of another early follower of Copernicus, Giordano Bruno, and this Brunian orientation will be used to characterize Kant’s philosophy as seen from Hegel’s rival Keplerian point of view. Interpreting Hegel as a philosophical Keplerian will require that we broach those worrisome aspects of Kepler’s astronomy, namely his support for Plato’s cosmology and the tradition of the “music of the spheres”, but this will be shown to have connections to Hegel’s own approach to logic. This in turn will help shed light on the meaning of Hegel’s form of idealism and, in particular, on its usually unacknowledged Platonic dimensions.
Reference57 articles.
1. Brinkmann, K. (2011). Idealism Without Limits: Hegel and the Problem of Objectivity, Springer.
2. Maddison, R.E.W. (1973). The Astronomical Revolution: Copernicus, Kepler, Borelli, Cornell University Press.
3. Perry, M.J. (1970). Hegel’s Philosophy of Nature, George Allen and Unwin.
4. Brown, R. (2009). Lectures on the History of Philosophy 1825-6, Oxford University Press. Volume III: Medieval and Modern Philosophy.
5. Stewart, J. (2002). Philosophical Dissertation on the Orbits of the Planets and the Habilitation Theses. Miscellaneous Writings of G. W. F. Hegel, Northwestern University Press.