Affiliation:
1. Department of Philosophy, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
Abstract
In this paper I hope to cast light on Wittgenstein enigmatic remark, “one should really only create philosophy poetically”. I discuss Wittgenstein’s ambition to overcome metaphysics by way of an appeal to ordinary language. For this purpose I contrast “realism” in philosophy (i.e., metaphysical realism, particularly its modern scientific version) with “realism” in poetry. My theme is the capacity of poetry to provide a model for Wittgenstein’s resistance to the inhumanity unleashed in metaphysics—exemplified by two distinct forms of skepticism—which obliterates the ordinary world under the guise of discovering its true nature. The poem I shall use to illustrate the difficulty in maintaining our grip on reality, hence our grip on our humanity, is Czeslaw Milosz’s poem “Realism”.
Reference20 articles.
1. Wittgenstein, L. (1998). Culture and Value, Blackwell. [2nd ed.].
2. Cavell, S. (1988). Quest of the Ordinary: Lines of Skepticism and Romanticism, University of Chicago Press.
3. Milosz, C. (1988). Realism. New & Collected Poems: 1931–2001, Harper Collins.
4. Sellars, W. (1963). Philosophy and the scientific image of the world. Science, Perception and Reality, Ridgeview.
5. Brockman, J. (2007). Francis Crick’s Dangerous Idea. What is Your Dangerous Idea?, Harper-Collins.