Natural Philosophy, Abstraction, and Mathematics among Materialists: Thomas Hobbes and Margaret Cavendish on Light
-
Published:2022-04-10
Issue:2
Volume:7
Page:44
-
ISSN:2409-9287
-
Container-title:Philosophies
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Philosophies
Abstract
The nature of light is a focus of Thomas Hobbes’s natural philosophical project. Hobbes’s explanation of the light (lux) of lucid bodies differs across his works, from dilation and contraction in Elements of Law to simple circular motions in De corpore. However, Hobbes consistently explains perceived light (lumen) by positing that bodily resistance (endeavor) generates the phantasm of light. In Letters I.XIX–XX of Philosophical Letters, fellow materialist Margaret Cavendish attacks the Hobbesian understanding of both lux and lumen by claiming that Hobbes has illicitly made abstractions from matter. In this paper, I argue that Cavendish’s criticisms rely on an incorrect understanding of the nature of Hobbesian geometry and the role it plays in Hobbes’s natural philosophy. Rather than understanding geometry as wholly abstract, Hobbes attempts to ground geometry in different ways of considering bodies and their motions. Furthermore, Hobbes’s own criticisms of abstraction suggest that he would share many of the worries she raises but deny that he falls prey to them.
Subject
History and Philosophy of Science,Philosophy
Reference52 articles.
1. Thomæ Hobbes Malmesburiensis Opera Philosophica;Hobbes,1839–1845
2. Leviathan;Hobbes,2012
3. Philosophical Letters;Cavendish,1664
4. Philosophical and Physical Opinions;Cavendish,1663