Affiliation:
1. Institute of Ecology and Environmental Sciences, Sorbonne Université, F-75005 Paris, France
Abstract
Since their emergence in the 1980s, environmental virtue ethics (EVEs) have aimed to provide an alternative to deontological and consequentialist approaches for guiding ecological actions in the context of the global environmental crisis. The deterioration of the ecological situation and the challenges in addressing collective action problems caused by global changes have heightened interest in these ethics. They offer a framework for meaningful individual actions independently of the commitment of other actors. However, by shifting the focus onto individuals, EVEs appear to grapple with the tension between anthropocentrism and respect for nature, as well as between self-flourishing and concern for other living beings. This article argues that this difficulty is rooted in the neglect within EVEs of the communitarian aspect of ancient virtue ethics. Drawing from Baird Callicott’s ecocentric approach and Val Plumwood’s works, this paper explores the possibility of conceiving ecological communities as collective frameworks in which both public and private virtues are defined and practiced.
Subject
History and Philosophy of Science,Philosophy
Reference26 articles.
1. Callicott, J.B. (2013). Thinking Like a Planet: The Land Ethic and the Earth Ethic, Oxford University Press.
2. Barnes, J. (2014). Complete Works of Aristotle, Volume 2: The Revised Oxford Translation, Princeton University Press.
3. Ideals of Human Excellence and Preserving Natural Environments;Hill;Environ. Ethics,1983
4. van Wensveen, L. (2000). Dirty Virtues: The Emergence of Ecological Virtue Ethics, Humanity Books.
5. Sandler, R.D., and Cafaro, P. (2005). Environmental Virtue Ethics, Rowman & Littlefield.