Abstract
Analogy is defined in many different ways. In this paper it is understood as a process in which the familiar structure of a direct experience in one situation is used to make conclusions regarding an expected experience within another structure. This process is based on the perceived similarity of the structures, not on rational, theoretical analysis of the relations between their components and the mechanisms of their interactions. The use of analogy relies on the engagement of intuitive recognition of the structural similarity between different instances of experience. The engagement of intuition does not preclude rational study and the development of strategies for using analogy, as part of this work focuses on rational learning about our own experience. Analogy plays two very different roles in this paper; as the main subject of this study, which focuses on the development of intercultural competence, and as a methodological instrument for carrying out and sharing the results of this study.
Subject
History and Philosophy of Science,Philosophy
Reference13 articles.
1. Impact of Study Abroad on Career Development and Life,2018
2. Purposes and Benefits of Undergraduate Study Abroad Programs and Their Place within the Curriculum;Adachi;Toyo Eiwa J. Humanit. Soc. Sci.,2010
3. Assessing Intercultural Competence: Issues and Tools;Fantini,2009
4. Which Competence? A Comparative Analysis of Culture-specific vs. Culture-generic Intercultural Competence Development
5. Test and Score Data Summary for TOEFL iBT Tests
http://www.ets.org/s/toefl/pdf/94227_unlweb.pdf
Cited by
4 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献