Abstract
Voice syncretism is widely attested crosslinguistically. In this paper, we discuss three different types of Voice syncretism, under which the same morpheme participates in different configurations. We provide an approach under which the same Voice head can convey different interpretations depending on the environment it appears in, thus building on the notion of allosemy. We show that, in all cases under investigation, allosemy is closely associated with the existence of idiosyncratic patterns. By contrast, we notice that allosemy and idiosyncrasy are not present in analytic passive and causative constructions across different languages. We argue that the distinguishing feature between the two types of constructions is whether the passive and the causative interpretation comes from the Voice head, thus forming a single domain with the vP or whether passive and causative semantics are realized by distinct heads above the Voice layer, thus forming two distinct domains.
Subject
History and Philosophy of Science,Philosophy
Reference119 articles.
1. The syntactic construction of two non-active Voices: Passive and middle
2. External Arguments in Transitivity Alternations: A Layering Approach;Alexiadou,2015
3. Voice at the Interfaces: The Syntax, Semantics, and Morphology of the Hebrew Verb;Kastner,2020
4. Antipassive Adds an Argument
Cited by
4 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Title Pending 9071;Glossa: a journal of general linguistics;2033-12-12
2. Title Pending 10202;Glossa: a journal of general linguistics;2033-12-07
3. Agentive reading in the Middle: The structure of Polish reflexiva tantum;Studies in Polish Linguistics;2024-07-03
4. On the distribution and interpretation of voice in Greek anticausatives;Frontiers in Psychology;2023-02-23