Abstract
This paper reconstructs Margaret Cavendish’s theory of the metaphysics of artifacts. It situates her anti-mechanist account of artifactual production and the art-nature distinction against a background of Aristotelian, Scholastic, and mechanist theories. Within this broad context, it considers what Cavendish thinks artisans can actually do, grounding her terminological stipulation that there is no genuine generation in nature in a commitment to natural and artistic production as the mere rearrangement of bodies. Bodies themselves are identified, in a conceptually Ockhamist manner, with their figures, so that the resulting theory of mere rearrangement is Scholastically respectable. The paper also offers literal interpretations, focused narrowly on the philosophical content of her theories of art and artifacts, of her claims that art concerns only “nature’s sporting or playing actions”, that its products are “deformed and defective”, and that they are “at best …mixt or hermaphroditical."
Funder
Research Foundation - Flanders
Subject
History and Philosophy of Science,Philosophy
Reference103 articles.
1. The Scientific Revolution;Shapin,1996
2. Spirits & Clocks: Machine & Organism in Descartes;Des Chene,2001
3. Modelling the history of early modern natural philosophy: the fate of the art-nature distinction in the Dutch universities
4. The philosophical innovations of Margaret Cavendish
5. Margaret Cavendish (1623–1673). Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy
https://iep.utm.edu/margaret-cavendish/
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献