Abstract
Part of the rationale behind public health measures is protecting the vulnerable. One of the groups most vulnerable to COVID-19 are the elderly and, consequently, many countries adopted public health measures that aimed to keep the elderly safe. The effectiveness and the consequences of those measures, however, leaves a lot to be desired. In my article, I will look at the steps that the Nordic countries took to protect their elderly and assess their success. I will further analyze those in the light of standard ethical theories. Public health crises often call for choices between two evils. Selecting patients for intensive care is one such choice, and again, it seems that for the elderly, the outcome was less than favorable. Overall, from the point of view of ethics, many countries failed miserably when it came to the treatment of the elderly. I will end my paper by discussing the lessons we can learn from the COVID-19 pandemic and suggests measures we need to take to offer genuine respect for the rights of the elderly.
Subject
History and Philosophy of Science,Philosophy
Reference14 articles.
1. The Rights of Elders in Ireland during COVID-19
2. Inspections at Care Homes for the Elderly—Similar Problems Reported at Multiple Locations. 18 March 2019
https://www.valvira.fi/-/valviran-ja-aluehallintovirastojen-tarkastuskaynnit-vanhusten-hoivakodeissa-samanlaiset-ongelmat-toistuivat-monin-paikoin
3. European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control
https://www.ecdc.europa.eu/en/all-topics-z/coronavirus/threats-and-outbreaks/covid-19/prevention-and-control/LTCF-data
4. The covid-19 pandemic and care homes for older people in Europe - deaths, damage and violations of human rights
5. Policy Brief: The Impact of COVID-19 on Older Persons, May 2020
https://unsdg.un.org/sites/default/files/2020-05/Policy-Brief-The-Impact-of-COVID-19-on-Older-Persons.pdf