Affiliation:
1. Academia Kantiana, Immanuel Kant Baltic Federal University, 236041 Kaliningrad, Russia
2. Department of Philosophy, University of Wuppertal, 42119 Wuppertal, Germany
Abstract
There is a widespread agreement that Nietzsche has developed a kind of position or doctrine called ‘perspectivism’. Scholars go on and develop metaphysical, semantic, epistemic, and psychobiological interpretations of the supposed Nietzschean perspectivism or even ‘perspectivisms’. They engage in debates about whether this perspectivism is relativistic, realistic, or anti-realistic and what the tenets of perspectivism are. In this paper, I suggest putting an end to this practice. I examine Nietzsche’s explicit mentions of the term ‘perspectivism’, the problems associated with the misunderstanding of this term as a label, attempts to reconstruct perspectivism based on explicit mentions of ‘perspective’ and related vocabulary, and doctrinal assumptions scholars try to connect with this terminology.
Funder
Russian Science Foundation
Russian Federal Academic Leadership Program Priority 2030
Reference47 articles.
1. Loeb, P.S., and Meyer, M. (2019). Nietzsche’s Metaphilosophy, Cambridge University Press.
2. Baghramian, M., and Coliva, A. (2019). Relativism: New Problems of Philosophy, Routledge.
3. Crețu, A.M., and Massimi, M. (2020). Knowledge from a Human Point of View, Springer.
4. Zalta, E.N. (2022). The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Springer. Available online: https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2022/entries/relativism/.
5. Irlenborn, B. (2016). Relativismus (Grundthemen Philosophie), de Gruyter.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献