The Normative Complexity of Virtues

Author:

Luvisotto Giulia1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Independent Researcher, London NW3 6AH, UK

Abstract

On what I will call the standard view, the distinction between the moral and the epistemic realms is both psychologically and conceptually prior to the distinction between any two given virtues. This widespread view supports the claim that there are moral and intellectual (or epistemic) virtues. Call this the fundamental distinction. In this paper, I raise some questions for both the standard view and the fundamental distinction, and I propose an alternative view on which virtues regain priority over the moral/epistemic divide. I suggest understanding them as normatively complex, distinctive sensitivities to both theoretical and practical reasons.

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

History and Philosophy of Science,Philosophy

Reference86 articles.

1. Toward a ‘Responsibilist’ Epistemology;Code;Philos. Phenomenol. Res.,1984

2. Character Traits, Virtues, and Vices;DePaul;Proc. Twent. World Congr. Philos.,2000

3. Cognitive Virtues and Epistemic Evaluations;Hookway;Int. J. Philos. Stud.,1994

4. Fileva, I. (2016). Questions of Character, Oxford University Press.

5. Epistemic Virtue;Montmarquet;Mind,1987

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3