Representing Human Ethical Requirements in Hybrid Machine Learning Models: Technical Opportunities and Fundamental Challenges

Abstract

Hybrid machine learning encompasses predefinition of rules and ongoing learning from data. Human organizations can implement hybrid machine learning (HML) to automate some of their operations. Human organizations need to ensure that their HML implementations are aligned with human ethical requirements as defined in laws, regulations, standards, etc. The purpose of the study reported here was to investigate technical opportunities for representing human ethical requirements in HML. The study sought to represent two types of human ethical requirements in HML: locally simple and locally complex. The locally simple case is road traffic regulations. This can be considered to be a relatively simple case because human ethical requirements for road safety, such as stopping at red traffic lights, are defined clearly and have limited scope for personal interpretation. The locally complex case is diagnosis procedures for functional disorders, which can include medically unexplained symptoms. This case can be considered to be locally complex because human ethical requirements for functional disorder healthcare are less well defined and are more subject to personal interpretation. Representations were made in a type of HML called Algebraic Machine Learning. Our findings indicate that there are technical opportunities to represent human ethical requirements in HML because of its combination of human-defined top down rules and bottom up data-driven learning. However, our findings also indicate that there are limitations to representing human ethical requirements: irrespective of what type of machine learning is used. These limitations arise from fundamental challenges in defining complex ethical requirements, and from potential for opposing interpretations of their implementation. Furthermore, locally simple ethical requirements can contribute to wider ethical complexity.