Affiliation:
1. Department of Mining Engineering and Mineral Economics, Montan Universität Leoben, 8700 Leoben, Austria
2. Department of Polymer Material Engineering, Hitit University, Corum 19030, Turkey
Abstract
In this study, the static E50 and υ parameters of rock materials were investigated using P-S wave velocities and Shore hardness (SH), using non-destructive measurement methods. In this study, the multiple linear regression (MLR), multiple non-linear regression (MNLR), and artificial neural network (ANN) models were used to estimate and determine the static E50 and υ parameters. When comparing the models defined by MLR, MNLR, and ANN to the R2 values, it was found that the ANN models, which estimate the E50 and υ parameters of rock materials using non-destructive methods (Vp, Vs, Vp/Vs, ρd, and SH), achieved higher accuracy than the MLR and MNLR models. The originality of this study is rooted in the fact that ores such as galena, chromite, and barite were studied for the first time from a rock mechanics perspective, providing an innovative viewpoint. In addition, the use of all non-destructive measurement methods, Vp, Vs, and Shore hardness tests, also increases the importance of the study findings.
Reference47 articles.
1. ISRM (1981). Rock Characterization, Testing and Monitoring, ISRM Suggested Methods, International Society for Rock Mechanic.
2. ASTM (1984). Soil and Rock Building Stones: Annual Book of ASTM Standards, ASTM Publication.
3. Estimation of static parameters based on dynamical and physical properties in limestone rocks;Ghafoori;J. Afr. Earth Sci.,2018
4. General relations between static and dynamic moduli of rocks;Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci. Geomech. Abstr.,1987
5. Correlation between P-wave velocity and physical-mechanical properties of intensely jointed dolostones, Peloritani mounts, NE Sicily;Pappalardo;Rock Mech. Rock Eng.,2015