Affiliation:
1. Department of Electronic Engineering, Hanyang University, Seoul 04763, Republic of Korea
2. Department of Artificial Intelligence, Hanyang University, Seoul 04763, Republic of Korea
3. Department of Biomedical Engineering, Hanyang University, Seoul 04763, Republic of Korea
Abstract
Controlling the in-car environment, including temperature and ventilation, is necessary for a comfortable driving experience. However, it often distracts the driver’s attention, potentially causing critical car accidents. In the present study, we implemented an in-car environment control system utilizing a brain-computer interface (BCI) based on steady-state visual evoked potential (SSVEP). In the experiment, four visual stimuli were displayed on a laboratory-made head-up display (HUD). This allowed the participants to control the in-car environment by simply staring at a target visual stimulus, i.e., without pressing a button or averting their eyes from the front. The driving performances in two realistic driving tests—obstacle avoidance and car-following tests—were then compared between the manual control condition and SSVEP-BCI control condition using a driving simulator. In the obstacle avoidance driving test, where participants needed to stop the car when obstacles suddenly appeared, the participants showed significantly shorter response time (1.42 ± 0.26 s) in the SSVEP-BCI control condition than in the manual control condition (1.79 ± 0.27 s). No-response rate, defined as the ratio of obstacles that the participants did not react to, was also significantly lower in the SSVEP-BCI control condition (4.6 ± 14.7%) than in the manual control condition (20.5 ± 25.2%). In the car-following driving test, where the participants were instructed to follow a preceding car that runs at a sinusoidally changing speed, the participants showed significantly lower speed difference with the preceding car in the SSVEP-BCI control condition (15.65 ± 7.04 km/h) than in the manual control condition (19.54 ± 11.51 km/h). The in-car environment control system using SSVEP-based BCI showed a possibility that might contribute to safer driving by keeping the driver’s focus on the front and thereby enhancing the overall driving performance.
Funder
Korean government
KIST Institutional Program
Reference42 articles.
1. Trends in fatalities from distracted driving in the United States, 1999 to 2008;Wilson;Am. J. Public Health,2010
2. The prevalence of, and factors associated with, serious crashes involving a distracting activity;McEvoy;Accid. Anal. Prev.,2007
3. Regev, S., Rolison, J., Feeney, A., and Moutari, S. (2017, January 20–22). Driver distraction is an under-reported cause of road accidents: An examination of discrepancy between police officers’ views and road accident reports. Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Driver Distraction and Inattention, Paris, France.
4. What are the factors that contribute to road accidents? An assessment of law enforcement views, ordinary drivers’ opinions, and road accident records;Rolison;Accid. Anal. Prev.,2018
5. Toward direct brain-computer communication;Vidal;Annu. Rev. Biophys. Bioeng.,1973