Integrated Methods for Selecting Construction Foundation Type Based on Using a Value Engineering Principle

Author:

Alsanabani Naif M.1,Al-Gahtani Khalid S.1ORCID,Bin Mahmoud Abdulrahman A.1ORCID,Aljadhai Saad I.1

Affiliation:

1. Department of Civil Engineering, King Saud University, P.O. Box 2454, Riyadh 114, Saudi Arabia

Abstract

The cost of constructing foundations, on average, ranges from 10% to 15% of a project’s total cost. Therefore, selecting the appropriate type of foundation may result in a significant reduction in project costs. In this study, a value engineering (VE) approach was applied to select the best foundation type from seven alternatives that covered shallow and deep foundations. Selection was dependent on ten important criteria, which were classified into safety, buildability, flexibility of architectural design, and environmental impact. Foundation construction experts used the stepwise weight assessment ratio analysis (SWARA) method to determine the weights of these ten properties for six identified cases based on structure type and soil type. In addition, the weighted aggregated sum product assessment (WASPAS) method was used to determine the quality weight for each foundation option. The results show that adaptable architectural design requirements were more critical in selecting the foundation than the safety criteria for a bridge project. Additionally, the criteria for environmental impacts in the case of high-rise buildings have a more significant impact on foundation choice than low-rise buildings. The outcomes of this study may improve the adaptability of architectural design and the environmental impact of future structures and building codes in the construction industry.

Funder

King Saud University

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law,Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment,Geography, Planning and Development,Building and Construction

Reference35 articles.

1. Potter, B. (2021). Construction Cost Breakdown and Partial Industrialization. Constr. Physic, Available online: https://www.construction-physics.com/p/construction-cost-breakdown-and-partial.

2. An automated environment for soils- and terrain-dependent applications;Oloufa;Autom. Constr.,1995

3. Multicriteria Evaluation of Building Foundation Alternatives;Turskis;Comput. Civ. Infrastruct. Eng.,2016

4. Xu, Z. (2015). Uncertain Multi-Attribute Decision Making, Springer.

5. Kahraman, C. (2008). Fuzzy Multi-Criteria Decision Making: Theory and Applications with Recent Developments, Springer.

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3