Inter-observer Variability in the Analysis of CO-RADS Classification for COVID-19 Patients

Author:

Almalki Yassir Edrees1ORCID,Basha Mohammad Abd Alkhalik2ORCID,Metwally Maha Ibrahim2,Housseini Ahmed Mohamed3,Alduraibi Sharifa Khalid4ORCID,Almushayti Ziyad A.4ORCID,Aldhilan Asim S.4,Elzoghbi Mahmoud Mohamed3,Gabr Esraa Attia3,Manajrah Esaraa5,Hijazy Reham Mohammed Farid5,Akbazli Loujain Mohamed Khear5,El Mokadem Ayman6,Basha Ahmed M. A.7,Mosallam Walid3

Affiliation:

1. Division of Radiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Medical College, Najran University, Najran 61441, Saudi Arabia

2. Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Faculty of Human Medicine, Zagazig University, Zagazig 44519, Egypt

3. Department of Radio-Diagnosis, Faculty of Human Medicine, Suez Canal University, Esmaelia 41522, Egypt

4. Department of Radiology, College of Medicine, Qassim University, Buraidah 52571, Saudi Arabia

5. Faculty of Human Medicine, Suez Canal University, Esmaelia 41522, Egypt

6. Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Faculty of Human Medicine, Suez Canal University, Esmaelia 41522, Egypt

7. Faculty of General Medicine, Saint Petersburg State University, Egypt Branch, Cairo 11646, Egypt

Abstract

During the early stages of the pandemic, computed tomography (CT) of the chest, along with serological and clinical data, was frequently utilized in diagnosing COVID-19, particularly in regions facing challenges such as shortages of PCR kits. In these circumstances, CT scans played a crucial role in diagnosing COVID-19 and guiding patient management. The COVID-19 Reporting and Data System (CO-RADS) was established as a standardized reporting system for cases of COVID-19 pneumonia. Its implementation necessitates a high level of agreement among observers to prevent any potential confusion. This study aimed to assess the inter-observer agreement between physicians from different specialties with variable levels of experience in their CO-RADS scoring of CT chests for confirmed COVID-19 patients, and to assess the feasibility of applying this reporting system to those having little experience with it. All chest CT images of patients with positive RT-PCR tests for COVID-19 were retrospectively reviewed by seven observers. The observers were divided into three groups according to their type of specialty (three radiologists, three house officers, and one pulmonologist). The observers assessed each image and categorized the patients into five CO-RADS groups. A total of 630 participants were included in this study. The inter-observer agreement was almost perfect among the radiologists, substantial among a pulmonologist and the house officers, and moderate-to-substantial among the radiologists, the pulmonologist, and the house officers. There was substantial to almost perfect inter-observer agreement when reporting using the CO-RADS among observers with different experience levels. Although the inter-observer variability among the radiologists was high, it decreased compared to the pulmonologist and house officers. Radiologists, house officers, and pulmonologists applying the CO-RADS can accurately and promptly identify typical CT imaging features of lung involvement in COVID-19.

Funder

Deanship of Scientific Research, Najran University, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

Infectious Diseases,Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health,General Immunology and Microbiology

Reference30 articles.

1. World Health Organization (2020). Novel Coronavirus (2019-nCoV) Situation Report-1, World Health Organization.

2. Genomic characterisation and epidemiology of 2019 novel coronavirus: Implications for virus origins and receptor binding;Lu;Lancet,2020

3. Evaluating the RSNA and CORADS classifications for COVID-19 on chest computed tomography in the Brazilian population;Fonseca;Clinics,2021

4. CO-RADS: Coronavirus Classification Review;Penha;J. Clin. Imaging Sci.,2021

5. Interobserver Agreement in the Analysis of the Different Radiological Classification of COVID-19 on Computed Tomography;Erol;Mediterr. J. Infect. Microb. Antimicrob.,2021

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3