Long-Lasting Insecticide-Treated Nets Combined or Not with Indoor Residual Spraying May Not Be Sufficient to Eliminate Malaria: A Case-Control Study, Benin, West Africa

Author:

Damien Barikissou G.12ORCID,Kesteman Thomas3ORCID,Dossou-Yovo Gatien A.12,Dahounto Amal12,Henry Marie-Claire12,Rogier Christophe34,Remoué Franck12ORCID

Affiliation:

1. MIVEGEC (Maladies Infectieuses et Vecteurs: Ecologie, Génétique, Evolution et Contrôle), Université de Montpellier, CNRS, IRD, 911 Avenue Agropolis BP 64501, 34394 Montpellier, France

2. Centre de Recherche Entomologique de Cotonou (CREC), Cotonou 06 BP 2604, Benin

3. Malaria Research Unit, Institute Pasteur de Madagascar, BP 1274 Avaradoha, Antananarivo 101, Madagascar

4. Primum Vitare, 118 Avenue Félix Faure, 75015 Paris, France

Abstract

In sub-Saharan Africa, despite the implementation of multiple control interventions, the prevalence of malaria infection and clinical cases remains high. The primary tool for vector control against malaria in this region is the use of long-lasting insecticide-treated nets (LLINs) combined or not with indoor residual spraying (IRS) to achieve a synergistic effect in protection. The objective of this study was to assess the effectiveness of LLINs, with or without IRS, protected against Plasmodium falciparum infection and uncomplicated clinical cases (UCC) of malaria in Benin. A case-control study was conducted, encompassing all age groups, in the urban area of Djougou and the rural area of Cobly. A cross-sectional survey was conducted that included 2080 individuals in the urban area and 2770 individuals in the rural area. In the urban area, sleeping under LLINs did not confer significant protection against malaria infection and UCC when compared to no intervention. However, certain neighbourhoods benefited from a notable reduction in infection rates ranging from 65% to 85%. In the rural area, the use of LLINs alone, IRS alone, or their combination did not provide additional protection compared to no intervention. IRS alone and LLINs combined with IRS provided 61% and 65% protection against malaria infection, respectively, compared to LLINs alone. The effectiveness of IRS alone and LLINs combined with IRS against UCC was 52% and 54%, respectively, when compared to LLINs alone. In both urban and rural areas, the use of LLINs alone, IRS alone, and their combination did not demonstrate significant individual protection against malaria infection and clinical cases when compared to no intervention. In the conditions of this study, LLINs combined or not with IRS are not effective enough to eliminate malaria. In addition to the interventions, this study identified factors associated with malaria in Benin as housing design, neglected social groups like gender-marginalised individuals and adolescents, and socio-economic conditions acting as barriers to effective malaria prevention. Addressing these factors is crucial in order to facilitate malaria elimination efforts in sub-Saharan Africa.

Funder

France Expertise Internationale—Initiative 5%

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

Infectious Diseases,Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health,General Immunology and Microbiology

Reference53 articles.

1. The Effect of Malaria Control on Plasmodium Falciparum in Africa between 2000 and 2015;Bhatt;Nature,2015

2. World Health Organization (2023, January 19). World Malaria Report 2022, Available online: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240064898.

3. World Health Organization (2022, February 18). Universal Access to Core Malaria Interventions in High Burden Countries. WHO Technical Consultation Meeting Report, Available online: https://cdn.who.int/media/docs/default-source/malaria/mpac-documentation/mpac-april2018-universal-access-core-interventions-session8-presentation.pdf?sfvrsn=ff25a2eb_2.

4. World Health Organization (2021). Global Technical Strategy for Malaria 2016–2030, 2021 Update, World Health Organization.

5. Combination of Malaria Vector Control Interventions in Pyrethroid Resistance Area in Benin: A Cluster Randomised Controlled Trial;Corbel;Lancet Infect. Dis.,2012

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3