Accuracy of Nanopore Sequencing as a Diagnostic Assay for Pulmonary Tuberculosis versus Smear, Culture and Xpert MTB/RIF: A Head-to-Head Comparison

Abstract

Early diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis (PTB) is pivotal for achieving effective tuberculosis (TB) control. This study aimed to assess the effectiveness of nanopore sequencing of sputum, bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF), and pleural fluid samples for achieving early PTB diagnosis and provided head-to-head comparisons of nanopore sequencing results versus results obtained using smear, culture, and Xpert MTB/RIF assays. Patients admitted from October 2021 to April 2023 were screened for PTB using diagnostic imaging and electronic medical records. A total of 172 patients (129 PTB, 43 non-TB patients) were included in the final analysis after the exclusion of patients who did not meet the study’s inclusion criteria. PTB-positive rates were determined for each assay, and then, assay diagnostic efficacies were compared. The positive MTB-detection rates obtained using nanopore sequencing were 86.8% for all samples, 62.3% for BALF, and 84.6% for pleural fluid, all of which were significantly higher than the corresponding rates obtained using the other three assays. The overall sensitivity rates, specificity rates, and area under the curve (AUC) values obtained from smear testing were 5.4%, 95.3%, and 0.504, respectively, as compared to the respective results obtained via culture (18.6%, 100.0%, and 0.593), Xpert MTB/RIF (26.4%, 97.7%, and 0.620), and nanopore sequencing (85.3%, 95.4%, and 0.903). The diagnostic efficacy of nanopore sequencing surpassed the diagnostic efficacies of smear, culture, and Xpert MTB/RIF assays. Thus, nanopore sequencing holds promise as an alternative to Xpert MTB/RIF for early PTB detection, particularly for the testing of BALF and pleural fluid samples.