Comparison of Parameter Estimation Methods Based on Two Additive Biomass Models with Small Samples

Author:

Xiong Nina1234,Qiao Yue3,Ren Huiru3,Zhang Li34,Chen Rihui34,Wang Jia12

Affiliation:

1. Beijing Key Laboratory of Precise Forestry, Beijing Forestry University, No. 35, Qinghua East Road, Haidian District, Beijing 100083, China

2. Forestry Institute, Beijing Forestry University, No. 35, Qinghua East Road, Haidian District, Beijing 100083, China

3. Management Research Department, Beijing Municipal Institute of City Management, Jia 48# Shangjialou, Chaoyang District, Beijing 100028, China

4. Beijing Key Laboratory of Municipal Solid Wastes Testing Analysis and Evaluation, Beijing Municipal Institute of City Management, Jia 48# Shangjialou, Chaoyang District, Beijing 100028, China

Abstract

Accurately estimating tree biomass is crucial for monitoring and managing forest resources, and understanding regional climate change and material cycles. The additive model system has proven reliable for biomass estimation in Chinese forestry since it considers the inherent correlation among variables based on allometric equations. However, due to the increasing difficulty of obtaining a substantial amount of sample data, estimating parameters for the additive model equations becomes a formidable challenge when working with limited sample sizes. This study primarily focuses on analyzing these parameters using data extracted from a smaller sample. Here, we established two additive biomass model systems using the independent diameter and the combined variable that comprises diameter and tree height. The logarithmic Nonlinear Seemingly Uncorrelated (logarithmic NSUR) method and the Generalized Method of Moments (GMM) method were applied to estimate the parameters of these models. By comparing four distinct approaches, the following key results were obtained: (1) Both the GMM and logarithmic NSUR methods can yield satisfactory goodness of fit and estimation precision for the additive biomass equations, with the root mean square error (RMSE) were significantly low, and coefficients of determination (R2) were mostly higher than 0.9. (2) Comparatively, examining the fitted curves of predicted values, the GMM method provided better fitting than the NSUR method. The GMM method with the combined variable is the most suggested approach for the calculation and research of single-tree biomass models with a small sample size.

Funder

Beijing Natural Science Foundation Program

Natural Science Foundation of China

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

Forestry

Reference30 articles.

1. Stand⁃level biomass estimation models for the tree layer of main forest types in East Daxing’an Mountains, China;Dong;Chin. J. Appl. Ecol.,2018

2. Aboveground tree biomass prediction options for the dry Afromontane forests in south-central Ethiopia;Asrat;For. Ecol. Manag.,2020

3. Comparison of artificial neural network with compatible biomass model for predicting aboveground biomass of individual tree;Liang;Chin. J. Appl. Ecol.,2022

4. Construction and precision analysis of individual tree biomass model of Larix olgensis considering random effects;Gao;J. Appl. Ecol.,2023

5. Forest biomass estimation methods and their prospects;Luo;Sci. Silvae Sin.,2009

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3