Abstract
This article revisits the traditionally jittery Latvian–Russian relations during the COVID-19 pandemic through the lens of securitization. Though the pandemic might have offered less space for confrontation and possible prospects for differentiation of (de)securitization vectors, the mutual securitization processes have continued in the vein of previous years. Furthermore, they have showed no signs of easing as not only have the traditional issues remained securitized but new thematic areas both related and unrelated to the pandemic have taken center stage. All in all, the pandemic has opened new avenues for securitization, though it had no fundamental impact on the established securitization trends.
Reference66 articles.
1. Securitization and desecuritization of Russia in the national security and defence concepts of Latvia (1995-2020)
2. Pētījums: Krievijā Ir Vislielākā Mirstība Pandēmijas Dēļ. 12 April 2021https://www.apollo.lv/7222614/petijums-krievija-ir-vislielaka-mirstiba-pandemijas-del
3. (Republished from LETA). “The Lancet”: Vairāku Valstu Zinātnieki Pauž Nopietnas Bažas Par “Sputnik V” Vakcīnas Drošību. 14 May 2021https://www.apollo.lv/7248625/the-lancet-vairaku-valstu-zinatnieki-pauz-nopietnas-bazas-par-sputnik-v-vakcinas-drosibu
4. The Theory and Practice of New Generation Warfare: The Case of Ukraine and Syria
5. Security: A New Framework for Analysis;Buzan,1998
Cited by
5 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献