Exploring Pathogenic and Zoonotic Bacteria from Wild Rodents, Dogs, and Humans of the Ngorongoro District in Tanzania Using Metagenomics Next-Generation Sequencing
-
Published:2023-09-01
Issue:3
Volume:3
Page:226-242
-
ISSN:2813-0227
-
Container-title:Zoonotic Diseases
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Zoonotic Diseases
Author:
Issae Amina Ramadhani123, Katakweba Abdul Selemani13, Kicheleri Rose Peter2, Chengula Augustino Alfred4, van Zwetselaar Marco5ORCID, Kasanga Christopher Jacob4
Affiliation:
1. African Centre of Excellence for Innovative Rodent Pest Management and Biosensor Technology Development, Sokoine University of Agriculture, Morogoro P.O. Box 3110, Tanzania 2. Department of Wildlife Management, Sokoine University of Agriculture, Morogoro P.O. Box 3073, Tanzania 3. Institute of Pest Management, Sokoine University of Agriculture, Morogoro P.O. Box 3110, Tanzania 4. Department of Microbiology, Parasitology and Biotechnology, Sokoine University of Agriculture, Morogoro P.O. Box 3019, Tanzania 5. Kilimanjaro Clinical Research Institute (KCRI), Kilimanjaro Christian Medical University, Moshi P.O. Box 2236, Tanzania
Abstract
Globally, zoonoses have serious consequences due to their socioeconomic impacts. Ngorongoro District is home to a diverse range of wildlife and domestic animals, including rodents and dogs, which often coexist in close proximity with humans. The aim of the study was to identify the zoonotic bacteria present in wild rodents, domestic dogs, and humans using metagenomics next-generation sequencing technology. A cross-sectional study was conducted in 2022. This study used both Illumina and Oxford Nanopore sequencing technologies to identify bacteria in 530 blood samples collected from humans (n = 200), wild rodents (n = 230), and dogs (n = 100). Several zoonotic airborne/contagious bacteria, including Mycobacterium spp., Mycoplasma spp., Bordetella spp., and Legionella spp., were detected in wild rodents, domestic dogs, and humans. Arthropod-borne zoonotic bacteria such as Bartonella spp., Borrelia spp., and Rickettsia spp. were detected in all three hosts, while Orientia spp. was found in wild rodents and domestic dogs. Yersinia pestis, Streptobacillus spp. and Anaplasma spp. were found only in wild rodents. Other zoonotic bacteria found shared among wild rodents, domestic dogs, and humans are Leptospira spp., Brucella spp., and Salmonella spp. Generally, wild rodents had the highest prevalence of zoonotic bacterial species when compared to domestic dogs and humans. The detection of zoonotic bacteria in rodents, dogs, and humans supports the hypothesis that infections can spread between animals and humans sharing the same environment.
Funder
African Centre of Excellence for Innovative Rodent Pest Management and Biosensor Technology Development
Reference66 articles.
1. Emerging zoonotic diseases originating in mammals: A systematic review of effects of anthropogenic land-use change;White;Mammal Rev.,2020 2. Anthropogenic environmental change and the emergence of infectious diseases in wildlife;Daszak;Acta Trop.,2001 3. Rahman, M.T., Sobur, M.A., Islam, M.S., Ievy, S., Hossain, M.J., El Zowalaty, M.E., Rahman, A.T., and Ashour, H.M. (2020). Zoonotic diseases: Etiology, impact, and control. Microorganisms, 8. 4. Prevalence of leptospirosis and toxoplasmosis: A study of rodents and shrews in cultivated and fallow land, Morogoro rural district, Tanzania;Mgode;Tanzan. J. Health Res.,2014 5. Theonest, N.O., Carter, R.W., Amani, N., Doherty, S.L., Hugho, E., Keyyu, J.D., Mable, B.K., Shirima, G.M., Tarimo, R., and Thomas, K.M. (2019). Molecular detection and genetic characterization of Bartonella species from rodents and their associated ectoparasites from northern Tanzania. PLoS ONE, 14.
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|