Evaluation of Copernicus DEM and Comparison to the DEM Used for Landsat Collection-2 Processing

Author:

Franks Shannon1,Rengarajan Rajagopalan1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. KBR, Contractor to the U.S. Geological Survey, Earth Resources Observation and Science Center, Sioux Falls, SD 57030, USA

Abstract

Having highly accurate and reliable Digital Elevation Models (DEMs) of the Earth’s surface is critical to orthorectify Landsat imagery. Without such accuracy, pixel locations reported in the data are difficult to assure as accurate, especially in more mountainous landscapes, where the orthorectification process is the most challenging. To this end, the Landsat Calibration and Validation Team (Cal/Val) compared the Copernicus DEM (CopDEM) to the DEM that is currently used in Collection-2 processing (called “Collection-2 DEM”). NGS ground-surveyed and lidar-based ICESat-2 points were used, and the CopDEM shows improvement to be less than 1 m globally, except in Asia where the accuracy and resolution of the DEM were greater for the CopDEM compared to the Collection-2 DEM. Along with slightly improved accuracy, the CopDEM showed more consistent results globally due to its virtually seamless source and consistent creation methods throughout the dataset. While CopDEM is virtually seamless, having greater than 99% of their data coming from a single source (Tandem-X), there are significantly more voids in the higher elevations which were mostly filled with SRTM derivatives. The accuracy of the CopDEM fill imagery was also compared to the Collection-2 DEM and the results were very similar, showing that the choice of fill imagery used by CopDEM was appropriate. A qualitative assessment using terrain-corrected products processed with different DEMs and viewing them as anaglyphs to evaluate the DEMs proved useful for assessing orbital path co-registration. While the superiority of the CopDEM was not shown to be definitive by the qualitative method for many of the regions assessed, the CopDEM showed a clear advantage in Northern Russia, where the Collection-2 DEM uses some of the oldest and least accurate datasets in the compilation of the Collection-2 DEM. This paper presents results from the comparison study, along with the justification for proceeding with using the Copernicus DEM in future Landsat processing. As of this writing, the Copernicus DEM is planned to be used in Collection-3 processing, which is anticipated to be released no earlier than 2025.

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

General Earth and Planetary Sciences

Reference62 articles.

1. Franks, S., Storey, J., and Rengarajan, R. (2020). The New Landsat Collection-2 Digital Elevation Model. Remote Sens., 12.

2. Nasadem Global Elevation Model: Methods and Progress;Crippen;Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci.,2016

3. The Shuttle Radar Topography Mission-Data Validation and Applications;Gesch;Photogramm. Eng. Remote Sens.,2006

4. Noltimier, K.F., Jezek, K.C., Sohn, H.G., Li, B., Liu, H., Baumgartner, F., Kaupp, V., Curlander, J.C., Wilson, B., and Onstott, R. (July, January 28). RADARSAT Antarctic Mapping Project-Mosaic Construction. Proceedings of the IEEE 1999 International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium. (Cat. No.99CH36293), Hamburg, Germany.

5. Danielson, J.J., and Gesch, D.B. (2011). Global Multi-Resolution Terrain Elevation Data 2010 (GMTED2010).

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3