Systematic Literature Review of Blockchain Technology’s Technical Challenges: A Tertiary Study

Author:

Chandan Anulipt1ORCID,Potdar Vidyasagar2,John Michele1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Sustainable Engineering Group, Curtin University, Perth, WA 6102, Australia

2. Discipline of Information Systems, Faculty of Business & Law, Curtin University, Perth, WA 6102, Australia

Abstract

Research into blockchain technology has expanded significantly due to its potential to enhance transparency and trust in business operations, yet adoption is limited by technical challenges like scalability, consensus mechanisms, and security, as well as non-technical barriers such as governance and standardization. This study synthesizes findings from 21 systematic literature reviews (SLR) published between January 2009 and January 2024, focusing on the technical performance of blockchain and its integration with technologies like cloud computing and machine learning. The analysis highlights advancements in scalability, security, privacy, and smart contracts alongside areas needing more research, such as interoperability and integration with legacy systems. This comprehensive review aims to map current technological developments, identify ongoing limitations, and identify specific technical challenges that impede broader adoption. The findings direct future research towards overcoming these barriers, facilitating the smoother implementation of blockchain across various business sectors.

Publisher

MDPI AG

Reference35 articles.

1. Yli-Huumo, J., Ko, D., Choi, S., Park, S., and Smolander, K. (2016). Where Is Current Research on Blockchain Technology?—A Systematic Review. PLoS ONE, 11.

2. OECD (2022). Blockchain at the Frontier: Impacts and Issues in Cross-Border Co-Operation and Global Governance, OECD Publishing.

3. PwC (2024, July 10). Time for Trust: How Blockchain Will Transform Business and the Economy. Available online: https://www.pwc.lu/en/blockchain-and-crypto-assets/time-for-trust.html.

4. A Decade of Blockchain: Review of the Current Status, Challenges, and Future Directions;Grigaitis;Informatica,2019

5. Kitchenham, B., and Charters, S. (2007). Guidelines for Performing Systematic Literature Reviews in Software Engineering, Department of Computer Science, Keele University. Evidence-Based Software Engineering (EBSE) Project; EBSE Technical Report, ver. 2.3.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3