Abstract
We consider the case of the Flemish city of Ypres and its reconstruction after World War I to analyze the legacies of war, as a violent shock to social- ecological systems for the meaning and organization of land. We argue that these legacies can only be understood when considering the multiple meanings of land, including its association with identity, and when distinguishing between the effects on the land itself, on the community inhabiting that land and the governance system in that community. We demonstrate that war, in its diversity of effects reinforces some path dependencies while erasing others and creates space for reinvention. If a city and its countryside are entirely devastated, as with Ypres, actors in governance come and go, old institutions lose their binding powers, some stories and forms of knowledge remain persuasive and locally rooted, while others whither. The necessity to decide on the future, in a landscape that requires rebuilding, triggers debate, discursive production and options for reinvention. We reflect on the lessons of Ypres for other communities forced to contemplate reconstruction.
Subject
Nature and Landscape Conservation,Ecology,Global and Planetary Change
Reference98 articles.
1. Gruezmacher, M., and Van Assche, K. (2022). Crafting Strategies for Sustainable Local Development, InPlanning.
2. Sustainability transformations: Socio-political shocks as opportunities for governance transitions;Olsson;Glob. Environ. Chang.,2020
3. Luhmann, N. (1995). Social Systems, Stanford University Press Stanford.
4. Regime shifts, resilience, and biodiversity in ecosystem management;Folke;Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst.,2004
5. The social, the ecological, and the adaptive. Von Bertalanffy’s general systems theory and the adaptive governance of social-ecological systems;Verschraegen;Syst. Res. Behav. Sci.,2019
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献