The Potential of Co-Designing with Living Organisms: Towards a New Ecological Paradigm in Architecture

Author:

Chayaamor-Heil Natasha12ORCID,Houette Thibaut3ORCID,Demirci Özge4,Badarnah Lidia5ORCID

Affiliation:

1. UMR MAP MAACC 3495 CNRS/MC, 23-27 Rue des Ardennes, 75019 Paris, France

2. National School of Architecture Paris La Villette, 23-27 rue des Ardennes, 75019 Paris, France

3. Department of Biology, The University of Akron, Akron, OH 44325, USA

4. Department of Architecture, Middle East Technical University, 06800 Ankara, Turkey

5. Department of Architecture and the Built Environment, Faculty of Environment and Technology, University of the West of England, Bristol BS16 1QY, UK

Abstract

Living organisms have been progressively used by designers to propose alternative design outcomes aiming towards more ecological aspects. The design development and manufacturing of new materials or design components from living organisms are more achievable in textile, fashion, or product design than in architecture and construction due to the scale, multi-layer constraints, and requirements. The aim of this paper is to investigate the interdisciplinary framework, the opportunities, and limitations of introducing living organisms into the design process, including the implementation from the design ideas to prototyping until commercialization. In this paper, we focus on three types of living organisms: algae, bacteria, and fungi. Firstly, we overviewed and studied existing projects and experimentations to understand the design process and fabrication of living organisms in other domains in comparison to architecture. Secondly, we selected three case studies in architecture for each organism to analyze. We collected the data and conducted interviews with multidisciplinary experts involved in each case. Our findings show a better understanding of the potential to integrate living organisms in architectural design, the advantages, and the difficulties towards ecological awareness. The results from the interview and a comparative analysis show the advantages and constraints of each case. The future outlooks towards the use of living organisms as part of design in architecture are also discussed.

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law,Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment,Geography, Planning and Development,Building and Construction

Reference206 articles.

1. IEA (2023, December 12). Buildings. Paris. Available online: https://www.iea.org/energy-system/buildings.

2. UNEP (2023, December 12). Global Status Report for Buildings and Construction. Towards a Zero Emissions, Efficient and Resilient Buildings and Construction Sector. Nairobi. Available online: www.globalabc.org.

3. Badarnah, L. (2012). Towards the LIVING Envelope: Biomimetics for Building Envelope Adaptation. [Ph.D. Thesis, Delft University of Technology].

4. Imhof, B., and Gruber, P. (2016). Built to Grow—Blending Architecture and Biology, Birkhäuser.

5. Chayaamor-Heil, N., Perricone, V., Gruber, P., and Guéna, F. (2023). Bioinspired, biobased and living material designs: A review of recent research in architecture and construction. Bioinspiration Biomim., 18.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3