Feasibility, Reliability, and Safety of Remote Five Times Sit to Stand Test in Patients with Gastrointestinal Cancer

Author:

Steffens Daniel12ORCID,Pocovi Natasha C.13,Bartyn Jenna12,Delbaere Kim45ORCID,Hancock Mark J.3,Koh Cherry126,Denehy Linda78ORCID,van Schooten Kimberley S.45ORCID,Solomon Michael126ORCID,

Affiliation:

1. Surgical Outcomes Research Centre (SOuRCe), Royal Prince Alfred Hospital (RPAH), Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia

2. Faculty of Medicine and Health, Central Clinical School, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2042, Australia

3. Faculty of Medicine, Health and Human Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW 2109, Australia

4. Neuroscience Research Australia, Randwick, Sydney, NSW 2031, Australia

5. School of Population Health, University of New South Wales, Kensington, NSW 2052, Australia

6. Department of Colorectal Surgery, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital (RPAH), Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia

7. Department of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Medicine Dentistry and Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC 3010, Australia

8. Department of Health Services Research, Allied Health, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC 3000, Australia

Abstract

Background: To determine the feasibility, reliability, and safety of the remote five times sit to stand test (5STS) test in patients with gastrointestinal cancer. Methods: Consecutive adult patients undergoing surgical treatment for lower gastrointestinal cancer at a major referral hospital in Sydney between July and November 2022 were included. Participants completed the 5STS test both face-to-face and remotely, with the order randomised. Outcomes included measures of feasibility, reliability, and safety. Results: Of fifty-five patients identified, seventeen (30.9%) were not interested, one (1.8%) had no internet coverage, and thirty-seven (67.3%) consented and completed both 5STS tests. The mean (SD) time taken to complete the face-to-face and remote 5STS tests was 9.1 (2.4) and 9.5 (2.3) seconds, respectively. Remote collection by telehealth was feasible, with only two participants (5.4%) having connectivity issues at the start of the remote assessment, but not interfering with the tests. The remote 5STS test showed excellent reliability (ICC = 0.957), with limits of agreement within acceptable ranges and no significant systematic errors observed. No adverse events were observed within either test environment. Conclusions: Remote 5STS for the assessment of functional lower extremity strength in gastrointestinal cancer patients is feasible, reliable, and safe, and can be used in clinical and research settings.

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

Cancer Research,Oncology

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3